Performance Results


Gaming 128% UFO	Desktop 95% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 118% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	144% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	93.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) (all builds)
Memory	10.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20200701
Uptime	1.6 Days
Run Date	Dec 02 '20 at 18:34
Run Duration	210 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	14%

PC Performing as expected (51^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 3600-$84 1,072,639 User benchmarks, average bench 83% AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	89.1% Excellent	Memory 78.8 1-Core 142 2-Core 281 90% 167 Pts	4-Core 534 8-Core 794 83% 664 Pts	64-Core 1,038 64% 1,038 Pts
Poor: 73% ↑ This bench: 89.1% Great: 92%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3070-$400 619,642 User benchmarks, average bench 148% Gigabyte(1458 404C) CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 457.30 Performing below potential (25^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	144% Outstanding	Lighting 207 Reflection 185 Parallax 207 169% 200 fps	MRender 193 Gravity 148 Splatting 132 126% 158 fps
Poor: 135% ↑ This bench: 144% Great: 158%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$130 602,853 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 282GB free Firmware: RVT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 437 435 448 452 453 453 MB/s Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)	111% Outstanding	Read 501 Write 438 Mixed 446 SusWrite 446 103% 458 MB/s	4K Read 39.8 4K Write 88.5 4K Mixed 52.9 175% 60.4 MB/s	DQ Read 218 DQ Write 184 DQ Mixed 199 150% 201 MB/s
Poor: 81% ↑ This bench: 111% Great: 133%
Intel SSDPEKNW010T9 1TB 20,963 User benchmarks, average bench 216% 952GB free Firmware: 001C SusWrite @10s intervals: 1504 1519 1670 1705 1709 1713 MB/s Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	288% Outstanding	Read 1,678 Write 1667 Mixed 1,195 SusWrite 1,637 348% 1,544 MB/s	4K Read 58.5 4K Write 143 4K Mixed 78.1 264% 93.2 MB/s	DQ Read 872 DQ Write 867 DQ Mixed 616 533% 785 MB/s
Poor: 139% ↑ This bench: 288% Great: 295%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$109 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 36GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 447 200 82 77 67 71 MB/s Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	93.9% Outstanding	Read 488 Write 440 Mixed 386 SusWrite 157 82% 368 MB/s	4K Read 41.5 4K Write 86.5 4K Mixed 54.2 178% 60.7 MB/s	DQ Read 219 DQ Write 184 DQ Mixed 200 150% 201 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 93.9% Great: 134%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial BL8G30C15U4R.M8FE 2x8GB 4,507 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz Performing as expected (41^st percentile)	79.8% Very good	MC Read 31.9 MC Write 22.2 MC Mixed 31.6 82% 28.6 GB/s	SC Read 22.6 SC Write 22 SC Mixed 29.5 71% 24.7 GB/s	Latency 82.9 48% 82.9 ns
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 79.8% Great: 99%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 129%

UFO

Desktop 94%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 130%

UFO

GPU
RTX 3070Nvidia $400Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	2,233x
RTX 3080Nvidia $910Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	2,072x
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples	1,465x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	1,834x
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $98Bench 394%, 276,089 samples	1,105x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $158Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	864x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	769x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $63Bench 85%, 346,786 samples	724x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GBCorsair $114Bench 89%, 144,399 samples	645x

Value: 98% - Outstanding

Total price: $932

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16