| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 39%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor. |
| Graphics | 35.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
| Motherboard | Asrock Q1900M (all builds) |
| Memory | 6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 7 |
| BIOS Date | 20161108 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Dec 02 '20 at 14:55 |
| Run Duration | 114 Seconds |
| Run User | BGR-User |
| Background CPU | 2% |
PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Celeron J1900
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2 GHz
|
39%
Below average
|
31% 43.7 Pts
|
12% 90.3 Pts
|
6% 90.5 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
AMD R9 280X-$500
CLim: 1020 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 20.11.3
Performing below potential (74th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
35.7%
Below average
|
39% 49.8 fps
|
29% 36.4 fps
| |
| Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Hitachi HDS721616PLA380 165GB-$46
61GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P22OAB3A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 30 48 29 44 45 49 MB/s
|
29.6%
Poor
|
35% 47 MB/s
|
145% 1.03 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Kingston 9905474-060.A00LF 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
26.6%
Poor
|
28% 9.83 GB/s
|
12% 4.13 GB/s
|
34% 119 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical Q1900M Builds (Compare 201 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asrock Q1900M
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| HD Graphics (Bay Trail 0.667 - 0.854 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 90,156 samples | 131x |
| R7 240AMDBench 5%, 58,337 samples | 8x |
| GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples | 8x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 21% - Poor | Total price: $28 |