Supermicro X9DAi

Performance Results


Gaming 26% Raft	Desktop 67% Battle cruiser	Workstation 25% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	30.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	54.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago.

System	Supermicro X9DAi (all builds)
Motherboard	Supermicro X9DAi
Memory	122.9 GB free of 128 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20150509
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Dec 02 '20 at 12:07
Run Duration	155 Seconds
Run User	CHE-User
Background CPU	2%

PC Performing as expected (60^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2620 0 2,873 User benchmarks, average bench 55% CPU 1, 2 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	60.9% Good	Memory 75.3 1-Core 66 2-Core 119 54% 86.9 Pts	4-Core 252 8-Core 398 40% 325 Pts	64-Core 939 58% 939 Pts
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 60.9% Great: 61%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 680-$360 38,995 User benchmarks, average bench 32% Zotac(19DA 1255) 2GB CLim: 1202 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 432.00 Performing below potential (54^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	30.9% Below average	Lighting 35.3 Reflection 36.1 Parallax 48.7 29% 40 fps	MRender 48.8 Gravity 44.8 Splatting 37.1 35% 43.6 fps
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 30.9% Great: 35%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 372GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 212 212 216 174 191 194 MB/s Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	54.7% Above average	Read 233 Write 223 Mixed 216 SusWrite 200 49% 218 MB/s	4K Read 21.9 4K Write 27.1 4K Mixed 24 78% 24.3 MB/s	DQ Read 203 DQ Write 190 DQ Mixed 196 147% 196 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 54.7% Great: 134%
Seagate ST8000DM002-1YW112 8TB 78 User benchmarks, average bench 68% 6TB free Firmware: DN01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 26 27 27 26 27 27 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 34% Great: 94%
VendorCo ProductCode 4GB 1,811 User benchmarks, average bench 5% 1GB free, PID 5678 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 14 14 13 14 14 MB/s Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	5.97% Terrible	Read 17.1 Write 7.8 Mixed 7.8 SusWrite 13.5 15% 11.6 MB/s	4K Read 2.3 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 8% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 5.97% Great: 7%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 9905403-518.A 16x8GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 79% 16 of 16 slots used 128GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	79.3% Very good	MC Read 34.9 MC Write 31.6 MC Mixed 30.1 92% 32.2 GB/s	SC Read 11 SC Write 5.2 SC Mixed 6 21% 7.4 GB/s	Latency 89.8 44% 89.8 ns
Poor: 79% ↑ This bench: 79.3% Great: 79%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X9DAi Builds (Compare 88 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 41%

Speed boat

Desktop 74%

Battleship

Workstation 45%

Yacht

System: Supermicro X9DAi

CPU
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2690 01stBench 68%, 2,388 samples	15x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2680 v21stBench 66%, 1,377 samples	7x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2630 v21stBench 64%, 1,265 samples	7x

GPU
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	8x
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	7x
RTX 3060Nvidia $274Bench 100%, 447,556 samples	7x

SSD
860 Evo 250GBSamsung $52Bench 104%, 296,814 samples	5x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	5x
320 Series 160GBIntel $149Bench 42%, 13,029 samples	3x

RAM
EBJ40EG8BFWB- EBJ40EG8BFWB- EBJ40EG8BFWB- EBJ40EG8BFWB- EBJ40EG8BFWB- Micron 9JSF51272AZ-1 EBJ40EG8BFWB- Micron 9JSF51272AZ-1 32GBElpidaBench 91%, 25 samples	12x
M393B2G70QH0- 4x16GBSamsungBench 88%, 200 samples	5x
M393B1K70DH0- 8x8GBSamsungBench 95%, 162 samples	4x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 51% - Above average

Total price: $252

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16