Razer Blade

Performance Results


Gaming 117% UFO	Desktop 92% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 110% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	139% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	284% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

CPU throttled at 99% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.

System	Razer Blade (all builds)
Motherboard	Razer C1_MB
Memory	57 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180905
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Dec 02 '20 at 04:23
Run Duration	112 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	9%
CPU Throttled	99%

Watch Gameplay: 3070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (59^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-8750H 442,631 User benchmarks, average bench 70% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	82.9% Excellent	Memory 83.7 1-Core 124 2-Core 247 84% 152 Pts	4-Core 441 8-Core 770 73% 605 Pts	64-Core 1002 62% 1002 Pts
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 82.9% Great: 86%

Graphics Cards	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10
Nvidia RTX 3070-$400 619,642 User benchmarks, average bench 148% Gigabyte(1458 404D); Gigabyte Vision OC CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 457.30 Performing below potential (13^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	139% Outstanding	Lighting 202 Reflection 186 Parallax 131 165% 173 fps	MRender 163 Gravity 147 Splatting 129 118% 146 fps
Poor: 135% ↑ This bench: 139% Great: 158%
Intel UHD Graphics 630 506,702 User benchmarks, average bench 5% Device(1A58 2000) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.7261 Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	5.96% Terrible	Lighting 6.4 Reflection 8.6 Parallax 7.5 5% 7.5 fps	MRender 9.8 Gravity 6.5 Splatting 10.4 7% 8.9 fps
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 5.96% Great: 6%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$150 200,600 User benchmarks, average bench 336% 812GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1374 1305 1273 1244 1372 1309 MB/s Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)	284% Outstanding	Read 2,148 Write 1,680 Mixed 988 SusWrite 1,313 342% 1,532 MB/s	4K Read 52.9 4K Write 109 4K Mixed 69.5 227% 77 MB/s	DQ Read 1,163 DQ Write 974 DQ Mixed 1,056 794% 1,064 MB/s
Poor: 223% ↑ This bench: 284% Great: 435%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471A4G43MB1-CTD 2x31.5GB 5,545 User benchmarks, average bench 79% 2 of 2 slots used 63GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	84.7% Excellent	MC Read 31.5 MC Write 33 MC Mixed 25.9 86% 30.1 GB/s	SC Read 18.3 SC Write 36.1 SC Mixed 25.9 76% 26.8 GB/s	Latency 73.9 54% 73.9 ns
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 84.7% Great: 86%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Blade Builds (Compare 4,024 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 13%

Tree trunk

Desktop 70%

Battleship

Workstation 12%

Tree trunk

System: Razer Blade

CPU
Core i7-8750HIntelBench 70%, 442,631 samples	2,060x
Core i7-9750HIntelBench 73%, 328,182 samples	1,068x
Core i7-7700HQIntelBench 62%, 473,208 samples	469x

GPU
UHD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 506,702 samples	1,446x
RTX 2070 (Mobile Max-Q)NvidiaBench 79%, 10,818 samples	595x
GTX 1060 (Mobile Max-Q)NvidiaBench 43%, 36,643 samples	398x

SSD
PM981 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsungBench 217%, 80,540 samples	816x
PM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsungBench 196%, 44,403 samples	287x
CA3-8D512 512GBLiteonBench 168%, 4,424 samples	248x

RAM
M471A1K43CB1-CTD 2x8GBSamsungBench 76%, 108,106 samples	1,754x
M471A1K43DB1-CTD 2x8GBSamsungBench 76%, 43,895 samples	371x
M471A5244BB0-CRC 2x8GBSamsungBench 72%, 2,214 samples	290x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16