Razer Blade

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 123%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 111%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics144% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive284% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
CPU throttled at 99% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
SystemRazer Blade  (all builds)
MotherboardRazer C1_MB
Memory57 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180905
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 02 '20 at 04:23
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU9%
CPU Throttled 99%
Watch Gameplay: 3070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
Intel Core i7-8750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
84.8% Excellent
Memory 83.7
1-Core 120
2-Core 233
83% 145 Pts
4-Core 462
8-Core 734
76% 598 Pts
64-Core 882
59% 882 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 84.8%
Great: 89%
Graphics Cards Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3070-$500
Gigabyte(1458 404D) ≥ 4GB; Gigabyte Vision OC
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 457.30
Performing below potential (17th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
144% Outstanding
Lighting 202
Reflection 186
Parallax 131
164% 173 fps
MRender 163
Gravity 147
Splatting 129
120% 146 fps
Poor: 132%
This bench: 144%
Great: 165%
Intel UHD Graphics 630
Device(1A58 2000) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.7261
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
5.41% Terrible
Lighting 6.4
Reflection 8.6
Parallax 7.5
5% 7.5 fps
MRender 9.8
Gravity 6.5
Splatting 10.4
6% 8.9 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.41%
Great: 6%
Drive Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$274
812GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 5,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1374 1305 1273 1244 1372 1309 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
284% Outstanding
Read 2,148
Write 1,680
Mixed 988
SusWrite 1,313
342% 1,532 MB/s
4K Read 52.9
4K Write 109
4K Mixed 69.5
227% 77 MB/s
DQ Read 1,163
DQ Write 974
DQ Mixed 1,056
794% 1,064 MB/s
Poor: 227%
This bench: 284%
Great: 395%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Samsung M471A4G43MB1-CTD 2x31.5GB
2 of 2 slots used
63GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
84.7% Excellent
MC Read 31.5
MC Write 33
MC Mixed 25.9
86% 30.1 GB/s
SC Read 18.3
SC Write 36.1
SC Mixed 25.9
76% 26.8 GB/s
Latency 73.9
54% 73.9 ns
Poor: 62%
This bench: 84.7%
Great: 86%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical Blade Builds (Compare 6,011 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

System: Razer Blade

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-11400F $260Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-11600K $270Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
Intel Core i7-11700K $380Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $184
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $79SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $34Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $80SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback