Motherboard | Asrock Z390 Pro4 | $118 |
CPU | Intel Core i5-9600K | $200 |
CPU Cooler | Deepcool GAMMAXX 400 | $25 |
GPU | AMD RX 6800-XT | $650 |
SSD | Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB | $85 |
RAM | Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB | $79 |
Power Supply | Corsair CX650M | $90 |
Case | Cooler Master MasterBox Q500L | $50 |
Total Price | $1,297 |
PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way above expectations (86th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 14 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master! |
Processor | With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 107%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding. |
Graphics | 164% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels. |
Boot Drive | 342% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Windows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion. |
Motherboard | Asrock Z390 Pro4 (all builds) |
Memory | 14.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20190503 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Dec 01 '20 at 22:51 |
Run Duration | 110 Seconds |
Run User | GBR-User |
Background CPU | 1% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() |
107%
Outstanding
|
106% 189 Pts
|
100% 773 Pts
|
61% 910 Pts
|
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() AMD RX 6800-XT-$650
AMD(1002 0E3A) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 16GB, Driver: 20.11.2
Performing below potential (48th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
164%
Outstanding
|
175% 300 fps
|
151% 258 fps
|
|
Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$85
201GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 5,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1322 1087 879 885 889 887 MB/s
|
342%
Outstanding
|
448% 2,003 MB/s
|
305% 105 MB/s
|
1,305% 1,767 MB/s
|
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() |
109%
Outstanding
|
111% 38.7 GB/s
|
97% 33.9 GB/s
|
81% 49.2 ns
|
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
---|---|
Core i5-9600KIntel $200Bench 94%, 248,401 samples | 1,261x |
Core i7-9700KIntel $290Bench 97%, 332,643 samples | 1,080x |
Core i9-9900KIntel $380Bench 98%, 292,441 samples | 427x |
![]() |
|
---|---|
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $510Bench 118%, 387,435 samples | 513x |
RTX 2070Nvidia $450Bench 106%, 347,927 samples | 383x |
RTX 2060Nvidia $338Bench 89%, 357,960 samples | 333x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 71% - Very good | Total price: $992 |