ADD TO PC
BUILD

HP p6-2056sc

Performance Results


Gaming 16% Surfboard	Desktop 73% Battleship	Workstation 13% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	16.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

System	HP p6-2056sc (all builds)
Motherboard	Foxconn 2ABF
Memory	5.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20110928
Uptime	0.5 Days
Run Date	May 07 '17 at 21:59
Run Duration	207 Seconds
Run User	SWE-User
Background CPU	4%

PC Performing as expected (56^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-2120-$170 77,810 User benchmarks, average bench 51% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	65% Good	Memory 92.2 1-Core 86.6 2-Core 168 69% 116 Pts	4-Core 221 8-Core 220 30% 221 Pts	64-Core 221 14% 221 Pts
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 65% Great: 61%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 650-Ti-$152 36,698 User benchmarks, average bench 14% PNY(196E 0997) 1GB CLim: 1043 MHz, MLim: 1445 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 373.6 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	16.6% Very poor	Lighting 20.1 Reflection 17.9 Parallax 23.3 16% 20.4 fps	MRender 23.2 Gravity 23.4 Splatting 17.3 17% 21.3 fps
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 16.6% Great: 15%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
OCZ AGILITY3 60GB 14,293 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 5GB free Firmware: 2.15 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (31^st percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 120 120 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 89 89 -37769942390952 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 938 (AB) Unknown 0 0 0 (AC) Unknown 0 0 0 (AE) Unknown 0 0 13 (B1) Unknown 0 0 6 (B5) Unknown 0 0 0 (B6) Unknown 0 0 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 30 30 128850984990 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 0 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 100 100 0 (CC) Soft ECC correction 100 100 0 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 100 (E7) Temperature 100 100 0 (E9) Unknown 0 0 3862 (EA) Unknown 0 0 2927 (F1) Unknown 0 0 2927 (F2) Unknown 0 0 5008	38.1% Below average	Read 186 Write 58.3 Mixed 87.6 24% 111 MB/s	4K Read 22.6 4K Write 51.5 4K Mixed 15.8 82% 30 MB/s	DQ Read 78.1 DQ Write 54.9 DQ Mixed 22.5 29% 51.8 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 38.1% Great: 51%
Seagate FireCuda SSHD 2TB (2016)-$79 133,734 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 1.5TB free Firmware: CC41 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (48^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 117 99 135200456 (03) Spinup time 94 94 0 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 51 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 62 60 1754487 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 504 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 51 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 64 57 689242148 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 1 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 1385 (C2) HDA temperature 36 43 73014444068 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 31301721653758 (F1) Unknown 100 253 692973849 (F2) Unknown 100 253 18056079150	83.8% Excellent	Read 122 Write 169 Mixed 121 103% 137 MB/s	4K Read 0.77 4K Write 5.31 4K Mixed 0.83 223% 2.31 MB/s
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 83.8% Great: 110%
Hitachi HDS721010CLA632 1TB-$109 12,285 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 195GB free (System drive) Firmware: JP4OA41A Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 86 0 (02) Throughput performance 135 100 97 (03) Spinup time 117 100 25790906691 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 2314 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 262148 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 142 100 29 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 18897 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 2303 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (B9) Unknown 100 100 65535 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 83 107873583 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 65 52 354680867 (C0) Power-off retract count 99 99 2321 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 99 99 2321 (C2) HDA temperature 171 130 206159347747 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 4 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	34.7% Below average	Read 65.5 Write 55.5 Mixed 37.1 39% 52.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.42 4K Write 0.99 4K Mixed 0.25 64% 0.55 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 34.7% Great: 76%
Seagate Expansion Desk 1TB 564 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 140GB free, PID 3320 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	12.1% Very poor	Read 27 Write 24 Mixed 26 33% 25.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.52 4K Write 0.9 4K Mixed 0.15 38% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 12.1% Great: 71%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378B5273CH0-CH9 2x4GB 5,657 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 2 of 2 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	52.6% Above average	MC Read 18.5 MC Write 18.6 MC Mixed 16.6 51% 17.9 GB/s	SC Read 14.9 SC Write 16.6 SC Mixed 16 45% 15.8 GB/s	Latency 63.7 63% 63.7 ns
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 52.6% Great: 53%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

The Best.

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $261	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback