Performance Results


Gaming 90% Nuclear submarine	Desktop 82% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 111% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	120% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	107% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Windows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.

High background CPU (24%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Micro-Star MS-7C84
Motherboard	MSI MAG X570 TOMAHAWK WIFI (MS-7C84) (all builds)
Memory	119.4 GB free of 128 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20200411
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Dec 01 '20 at 22:19
Run Duration	205 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	24%

PC Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT-$530 10,305 User benchmarks, average bench 89% AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads Base clock 4.15 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	72.8% Very good	Memory 67.1 1-Core 108 2-Core 217 73% 131 Pts	4-Core 420 8-Core 832 77% 626 Pts	64-Core 2,150 144% 2,150 Pts
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 72.8% Great: 95%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080S (Super)-$770 146,703 User benchmarks, average bench 138% EVGA(3842 2085) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3875 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 457.30 Performing below potential (8^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	120% Outstanding	Lighting 139 Reflection 215 Parallax 142 112% 165 fps	MRender 197 Gravity 153 Splatting 126 129% 159 fps
Poor: 118% ↑ This bench: 120% Great: 151%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Seagate FireCuda 120 SSD ZA1000GM10001 1TB 64 User benchmarks, average bench 120% 643GB free (System drive) Firmware: SU0SC011 SusWrite @10s intervals: 433 424 423 432 433 434 MB/s Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	107% Outstanding	Read 462 Write 432 Mixed 435 SusWrite 430 99% 440 MB/s	4K Read 39.5 4K Write 86 4K Mixed 51.2 171% 58.9 MB/s	DQ Read 220 DQ Write 187 DQ Mixed 202 152% 203 MB/s
Poor: 101% ↑ This bench: 107% Great: 137%
Sabrent Rocket Q4 2TB 369 User benchmarks, average bench 344% 1TB free Firmware: RKT40Q.1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 3167 3135 3092 3159 3052 3135 MB/s Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)	396% Outstanding	Read 1,694 Write 3,256 Mixed 1686 SusWrite 3,123 556% 2,440 MB/s	4K Read 50.1 4K Write 175 4K Mixed 83.7 276% 103 MB/s	DQ Read 1,281 DQ Write 1,059 DQ Mixed 1,200 890% 1,180 MB/s
Poor: 187% ↑ This bench: 396% Great: 436%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$52 280,094 User benchmarks, average bench 90% 2TB free Firmware: 0001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 214 216 213 218 212 213 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 59% Great: 108%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair CMW64GX4M2D3600C18 4x31.8GB 148 User benchmarks, average bench 101% 4 of 4 slots used 127GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)	75.1% Very good	MC Read 30.8 MC Write 25.8 MC Mixed 25.5 78% 27.4 GB/s	SC Read 18 SC Write 26.1 SC Mixed 23.3 64% 22.5 GB/s	Latency 108 37% 108 ns
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 75.1% Great: 190%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 176%

UFO

Desktop 95%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 179%

UFO

GPU
RTX 3080Nvidia $700Bench 203%, 75,734 samples	1,443x
RTX 3070Nvidia $500Bench 153%, 82,730 samples	819x
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $510Bench 118%, 403,865 samples	785x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $150Bench 329%, 169,427 samples	691x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $140Bench 306%, 195,610 samples	558x
Rocket 4 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSabrent $170Bench 356%, 29,642 samples	489x

RAM
F4 DDR4 3600 C16 2x16GBG.SKILLBench 104%, 37,874 samples	632x
F4 DDR4 3600 C16 2x16GBG.SKILLBench 101%, 15,839 samples	323x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GBCorsair $214Bench 87%, 70,218 samples	261x

Value: 76% - Very good

Total price: $1,217

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $47	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $79	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $71	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16