Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 5% Tree trunk	Desktop 51% Yacht	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	4.2% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (55%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-1607 0 2,020 User benchmarks, average bench 62% CPU 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	57.1% Above average	Memory 69 1-Core 70.3 2-Core 147 56% 95.6 Pts	4-Core 274 8-Core 207 34% 240 Pts	64-Core 259 16% 259 Pts
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 57.1% Great: 68%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 730 164,888 User benchmarks, average bench 5% MSI(1462 8A9F) 2GB CLim: 850 MHz, MLim: 460 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 388.13 Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)	4.2% Terrible	Lighting 5.2 Reflection 7.1 Parallax 1.6 4% 4.63 fps	MRender 6.4 Gravity 5.2 Splatting 4 4% 5.2 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 4.2% Great: 7%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Toshiba P300 2TB-$61 100,891 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 758GB free (System drive) Firmware: MX4OACF0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 36 13 30 29 15 19 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile)	7.77% Terrible	Read 3.5 Write 11.5 Mixed 15.7 SusWrite 23.5 10% 13.6 MB/s	4K Read 0 4K Write 0.5 4K Mixed 0.1 20% 0.2 MB/s
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 7.77% Great: 108%
pny USB 2.0 FD 32GB 251 User benchmarks, average bench 7% 24GB free, PID 005d Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete		Read 22.1 14% 22.1 MB/s	4K Read 4.3 4K Write 0.5 4K Mixed 0.1 36% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 5% Great: 8%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown RMR1881ED58E9 Corsair CMZ8GX3M1A160 RMR1881ED58E9 Corsair CMZ8GX3M1A160 RMR1881ED58E9 RMR1881ED58E9 32GB 1066, 1066, 1066, 1066, 1066, 1066 MHz 4096, 8192, 4096, 8192, 4096, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	56.6% Above average	MC Read 21.1 MC Write 24.6 MC Mixed 19.4 62% 21.7 GB/s	SC Read 11.1 SC Write 10.3 SC Mixed 9 29% 10.1 GB/s	Latency 104 38% 104 ns

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16