Asus TUF Z370-PLUS GAMING

Performance Results


Gaming 54% Yacht	Desktop 87% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 45% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	61.7% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	64.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Windows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.

Run History

1 month ago, 1 month ago.

Motherboard	Asus TUF Z370-PLUS GAMING (all builds)
Memory	9.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit farver
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180111
Uptime	11.8 Days
Run Date	Dec 01 '20 at 20:58
Run Duration	125 Seconds
Run User	DNK-User
Background CPU	7%

PC Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-8700-$320 238,707 User benchmarks, average bench 90% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	82% Excellent	Memory 90 1-Core 125 2-Core 235 87% 150 Pts	4-Core 403 8-Core 562 63% 482 Pts	64-Core 633 42% 633 Pts
Poor: 79% ↑ This bench: 82% Great: 96%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-$500 129,803 User benchmarks, average bench 61% MSI(1462 3176) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1443 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 451.67 Performing below potential (73^rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	61.7% Good	Lighting 77.1 Reflection 86.3 Parallax 76.6 62% 80 fps	MRender 77.9 Gravity 75.1 Splatting 67.5 61% 73.5 fps
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 61.7% Great: 67%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
HyperX Fury 120GB-$160 5,778 User benchmarks, average bench 63% 37GB free (System drive) Firmware: 605ABBF1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 90 100 97 101 99 MB/s Performing below potential (49^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	64.7% Good	Read 244 Write 145 Mixed 180 SusWrite 94.5 37% 166 MB/s	4K Read 25.3 4K Write 104 4K Mixed 37.1 141% 55.4 MB/s	DQ Read 118 DQ Write 146 DQ Mixed 89.2 79% 118 MB/s
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 64.7% Great: 73%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$52 291,933 User benchmarks, average bench 87% 584GB free Firmware: 0001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 165 160 155 155 158 169 MB/s Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	77.3% Very good	Read 109 Write 129 Mixed 71.9 SusWrite 160 86% 118 MB/s	4K Read 1.3 4K Write 0.8 4K Mixed 0.4 113% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 77.3% Great: 108%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL Trident Z RGB DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB-$95 170,578 User benchmarks, average bench 87% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	65.4% Good	MC Read 27.2 MC Write 22.9 MC Mixed 19.3 66% 23.1 GB/s	SC Read 17.2 SC Write 19.9 SC Mixed 18.6 53% 18.6 GB/s	Latency 67.2 60% 67.2 ns
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 65.4% Great: 107%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money.

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF Z370-PLUS GAMING Builds (Compare 4,443 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.

Gaming 59%

Gunboat

Desktop 98%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 55%

Yacht

Motherboard: Asus TUF Z370-PLUS GAMING - $280

CPU
Core i7-8700KIntel $320Bench 93%, 532,704 samples	1,391x
Core i5-8600KIntel $218Bench 92%, 178,623 samples	869x
Core i7-8700Intel $320Bench 90%, 238,707 samples	589x

GPU
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $290Bench 57%, 1,110,464 samples	455x
GTX 1080Nvidia $450Bench 106%, 786,866 samples	444x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $808Bench 136%, 606,625 samples	383x

SSD
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $65Bench 273%, 307,134 samples	155x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $57Bench 108%, 504,559 samples	138x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $70Bench 105%, 768,156 samples	112x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $71Bench 84%, 455,838 samples	238x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $79Bench 85%, 403,833 samples	137x
DDR4 3000 2OZ 2x8GBAdataBench 86%, 18,688 samples	90x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 73% - Very good

Total price: $1,026

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-10600K $257	Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400	Crucial MX500 250GB $47
Intel Core i5-9600K $219	Nvidia RTX 3070 $500	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i5-10400F $161	Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $40

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $43	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $79	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $71	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16