PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good. |
Graphics | 208% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels. |
Boot Drive | 90.7% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
Memory | 32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asus X99-A/USB 3.1 (all builds) |
Memory | 23.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20190710 |
Uptime | 2 Days |
Run Date | Dec 01 '20 at 16:54 |
Run Duration | 189 Seconds |
Run User | FRA-User |
Background CPU | 15% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i7-6950X-$499
SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 5 cores, 10 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
|
82.8%
Excellent
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia RTX 3090-$1,420
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 4875 MHz, Ram: 24GB, Driver: 457.30
Performing below potential (44th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
208%
Outstanding
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Crucial MX500 250GB-$40
65GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 023
SusWrite @10s intervals: 417 418 412 413 413 414 MB/s
|
90.7%
Outstanding
|
|||
WD WD10EAVS-00D7B1 1TB
296GB free
Firmware: 1A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 60 59 60 62 62 61 MB/s
|
41.6%
Average
|
|||
Seagate M3 2TB
619GB free
Firmware: 9300
SusWrite @10s intervals: 40 41 40 41 41 41 MB/s
|
22.6%
Poor
|
|||
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$31
102GB free
Firmware: CC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 106 106 109 108 115 109 MB/s
|
62.2%
Good
|
|||
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 1TB
340GB free, PID 0900
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 41 41 41 41 40 41 MB/s
|
33.3%
Below average
|
|||
WD Elements 25A1 3TB
599GB free, PID 25a1
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 54 55 54 55 54 55 MB/s
|
28.4%
Poor
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Micron 16ATF1G64AZ-2G1A1 4x8GB
4 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
|
123%
Outstanding
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i7-5820KIntel $130Bench 77%, 101,694 samples | 762x |
Core i7-5930KIntel $70Bench 80%, 34,039 samples | 194x |
Core i7-6800KIntel $103Bench 81%, 50,196 samples | 91x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples | 118x |
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples | 114x |
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 109x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 94% - Outstanding | Total price: $357 |