Samsung 355V4C/356V4C/3445VC/3545VC

Performance Results


Gaming 6% Tree trunk	Desktop 50% Yacht	Workstation 5% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 51%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	4.73% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	56.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 8 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago.

System	Samsung 355V4C/356V4C/3445VC/3545VC (all builds)
Motherboard	SAMSUNG NP355V5C-S0NRU
Memory	5.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display	Цвета: 1366 x 768 - 32 Bit
OS	Windows 8
BIOS Date	20130704
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Dec 01 '20 at 14:16
Run Duration	116 Seconds
Run User	RUS-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD A10-4600M APU 5,886 User benchmarks, average bench 43% P0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.75 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	51% Above average	Memory 78.3 1-Core 48.7 2-Core 85.6 47% 70.9 Pts	4-Core 141 8-Core 139 19% 140 Pts	64-Core 140 9% 140 Pts
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 51% Great: 51%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 7660G 4,227 User benchmarks, average bench 4% Sanyo(144D C0DA) 512MB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.200.1062.1004 Performing above expectations (79^th percentile)	4.73% Terrible	Lighting 5.7 Reflection 8.2 Parallax 6.1 5% 6.67 fps	MRender 5.6 Gravity 5.5 Splatting 6.6 5% 5.9 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 4.73% Great: 5%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
OCZ Trion 100 240GB-$95 9,561 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 60GB free (System drive) Firmware: SAFM11.2 SusWrite @10s intervals: 153 71 86 99 111 80 MB/s Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)	56.5% Above average	Read 394 Write 79.3 Mixed 314 SusWrite 99.9 49% 222 MB/s	4K Read 18.8 4K Write 41.3 4K Mixed 23 80% 27.7 MB/s	DQ Read 263 DQ Write 184 DQ Mixed 168 140% 205 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 56.5% Great: 83%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471B5273DH0-CK0 M471B5273DH0-CK0 8GB 243 User benchmarks, average bench 31% 800, 800 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	34.7% Below average	MC Read 17.1 MC Write 6.6 MC Mixed 12.2 34% 12 GB/s	SC Read 8.4 SC Write 7.4 SC Mixed 10.7 25% 8.83 GB/s	Latency 83.8 48% 83.8 ns
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 34.7% Great: 46%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical 355V4C/356V4C/3445VC/3545VC Builds (Compare 53 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 5%

Tree trunk

Desktop 39%

Jet ski

Workstation 4%

Tree trunk

System: Samsung 355V4C/356V4C/3445VC/3545VC

CPU
A8-4500M APUAMDBench 39%, 9,726 samples	18x
A6-4400M APUAMDBench 35%, 6,363 samples	10x
A10-4600M APUAMDBench 43%, 5,886 samples	9x

GPU
Radeon HD 7640GAMDBench 3%, 7,719 samples	18x
Radeon HD 7520GAMDBench 2%, 4,996 samples	10x
Radeon HD 7660GAMDBench 4%, 4,227 samples	9x

SSD
BX500 240GBCrucial $29Bench 56%, 142,801 samples	4x
840 Evo 120GBSamsung $85Bench 91%, 104,444 samples	4x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	2x

RAM
M471B5273EB0-CK0 M471B5273EB0-CK0 8GBSamsungBench 28%, 329 samples	8x
CT102464BF186D.M16 CT8G3S186DM.C16FN 16GBUnknownBench 33%, 7 samples	4x
M471B5273DH0-CK0 M471B5273DH0-CK0 8GBSamsungBench 31%, 243 samples	4x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 18% - Very poor

Total price: $29

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16