Asus Crosshair V Formula

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 49%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 40%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics61.8% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive178% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus Crosshair V Formula  (all builds)
Memory14.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.9 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121017
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateDec 01 '20 at 02:43
Run Duration147 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU 100%
Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (69th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8320-$129
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
73.7% Very good
Memory 91.7
1-Core 74.5
2-Core 150
64% 106 Pts
4-Core 301
8-Core 456
47% 379 Pts
64-Core 461
28% 461 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 73.7%
Great: 65%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130
CLim: 1461 MHz, MLim: 2249 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 20.11.2
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
61.8% Good
Lighting 80.7
Reflection 67.8
Parallax 101
66% 83.3 fps
MRender 72.5
Gravity 81.7
Splatting 50.8
54% 68.3 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 61.8%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$46
212GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1046 576 404 407 406 404 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
178% Outstanding
Read 1,335
Write 1,063
Mixed 1,018
SusWrite 541
221% 989 MB/s
4K Read 54.4
4K Write 104
4K Mixed 69.1
226% 75.8 MB/s
DQ Read 542
DQ Write 392
DQ Mixed 497
363% 477 MB/s
Poor: 152%
This bench: 178%
Great: 302%
WD Green 120GB (2018)-$59
27GB free
Firmware: UE510000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 291 106 74 68 68 62 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
52.4% Above average
Read 447
Write 185
Mixed 262
SusWrite 112
56% 251 MB/s
4K Read 22.1
4K Write 36.2
4K Mixed 19.4
78% 25.9 MB/s
DQ Read 116
DQ Write 68.5
DQ Mixed 41.9
45% 75.4 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 52.4%
Great: 53%
WD Green 1TB (2011)-$109
125GB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 56 34 62 43 46 58 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
35.6% Below average
Read 73.9
Write 76.2
Mixed 85.5
SusWrite 49.6
54% 71.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.8
156% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 35.6%
Great: 69%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 16GB
1866, 1866 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
55.3% Above average
MC Read 23.4
MC Write 17.1
MC Mixed 19.6
57% 20 GB/s
SC Read 12.7
SC Write 8.8
SC Mixed 13.4
33% 11.6 GB/s
Latency 64.5
62% 64.5 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 55.3%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Crosshair V Formula Builds (Compare 273 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 32%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus Crosshair V Formula - $220

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 56% - Above average Total price: $680
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback