Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 29% Raft	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 30%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	0.85% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	56% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (29%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Pentium N3530 5,111 User benchmarks, average bench 35% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.15 GHz, turbo 2.15 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (20^th percentile)	30% Below average	Memory 46.5 1-Core 20.4 2-Core 41.1 25% 36 Pts	4-Core 80 8-Core 80.5 11% 80.2 Pts	64-Core 82.6 5% 82.6 Pts
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 30% Great: 40%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail 0.667 - 0.854 GHz) 90,156 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Device(1854 0200) 2GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4303 Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)	0.85% Terrible	Lighting 0.9 Reflection 1 Parallax 0.7 1% 0.87 fps	MRender 1.8 Gravity 0.9 Splatting 1.3 1% 1.33 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.85% Great: 1%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
PNY CS900 120GB-$25 42,924 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 63GB free (System drive) Firmware: CS900613 SusWrite @10s intervals: 232 184 195 78 79 80 MB/s Performing below potential (14^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	56% Above average	Read 251 Write 214 Mixed 212 SusWrite 141 46% 204 MB/s	4K Read 25.9 4K Write 41.8 4K Mixed 25.8 94% 31.2 MB/s	DQ Read 190 DQ Write 185 DQ Mixed 148 122% 174 MB/s
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 56% Great: 87%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair SODIM DDR3 1333 C9 1x8GB 73 User benchmarks, average bench 22% 1 of 2 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing as expected (48^th percentile)	20.4% Poor	MC Read 7.7 MC Write 7.7 MC Mixed 6.9 21% 7.43 GB/s	SC Read 2.8 SC Write 5.2 SC Mixed 4.4 12% 4.13 GB/s	Latency 174 23% 174 ns
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 20.4% Great: 29%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 32%

Sail boat

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

CPU
Pentium N3530IntelBench 35%, 5,111 samples	20x

GPU
HD Graphics (Bay Trail 0.667 - 0.854 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 90,156 samples	20x

RAM
SH564128FJ8NWRNSQR 1x4GBSmartBench 24%, 2,696 samples	15x
99U5428-018.A00LF 1x8GBKingstonBench 26%, 6,120 samples	1x
1x8GBKingstonBench 32%, 3,554 samples	1x

Value: 18% - Very poor

Total price: $29

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16