Asus M5A99FX PRO R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics29.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive39.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus M5A99FX PRO R2.0  (all builds)
Memory7.1 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130111
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateNov 30 '20 at 22:25
Run Duration144 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU 19%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-6350 Six-Core-$100
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
64.1% Good
Memory 88.6
1-Core 73.3
2-Core 138
62% 100 Pts
4-Core 218
8-Core 300
33% 259 Pts
64-Core 303
19% 303 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 64.1%
Great: 66%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 457.30
Performing below potential (76th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
29.6% Poor
Lighting 37.3
Reflection 41.8
Parallax 38.9
30% 39.3 fps
MRender 37.9
Gravity 39.2
Splatting 28
28% 35 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 29.6%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SSD 120GB 120GB
58GB free (System drive)
Firmware: R1001A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 70 20 26 19 17 32 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
39.1% Below average
Read 482
Write 59.2
Mixed 22.8
SusWrite 30.8
31% 149 MB/s
4K Read 21.5
4K Write 42.9
4K Mixed 1.3
57% 21.9 MB/s
DQ Read 58.1
DQ Write 59.2
DQ Mixed 0.2
16% 39.2 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 39.1%
Great: 81%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$34
589GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 176 171 179 181 180 180 MB/s
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
107% Outstanding
Read 197
Write 139
Mixed 69.4
SusWrite 178
106% 146 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
162% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 107%
Great: 113%
Seagate ST3160815AS 160GB-$46
140GB free
Firmware: 4.AAB
SusWrite @10s intervals: 71 73 75 75 75 75 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
38.4% Below average
Read 59.7
Write 29.1
Mixed 39.3
SusWrite 73.9
37% 50.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.6
118% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 38.4%
Great: 42%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F3-14900CL9-4GBSR KRE-D3U1600M/4G F3-14900CL9-4GBSR 12GB
1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
40.6% Average
MC Read 16.5
MC Write 12.2
MC Mixed 13.2
40% 14 GB/s
SC Read 10.1
SC Write 7.5
SC Mixed 12.5
29% 10 GB/s
Latency 68.9
58% 68.9 ns
Poor: 37%
This bench: 40.6%
Great: 41%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M5A99FX PRO R2.0 Builds (Compare 1,063 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus M5A99FX PRO R2.0 - $200

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 57% - Above average Total price: $610
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $132Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback