Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS

Performance Results


Gaming 55% Gunboat	Desktop 87% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 54% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	57.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	83.7% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Windows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.

Very high background CPU (51%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

1 month ago, 1 month ago.

Motherboard	Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (all builds)
Memory	26.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.8 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20200401
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Nov 30 '20 at 00:56
Run Duration	172 Seconds
Run User	MAR-User
Background CPU	51%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X-$270 409,574 User benchmarks, average bench 82% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)	84.4% Excellent	Memory 83.2 1-Core 116 2-Core 228 82% 143 Pts	4-Core 460 8-Core 812 80% 636 Pts	64-Core 1,201 81% 1,201 Pts
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 84.4% Great: 89%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$290 1,047,709 User benchmarks, average bench 57% Asus(1043 854A) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 456.55 Performing below potential (63^rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	57.1% Above average	Lighting 71.3 Reflection 73.9 Parallax 74.7 58% 73.3 fps	MRender 66.8 Gravity 70.7 Splatting 66.5 57% 68 fps
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 57.1% Great: 61%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$40 196,297 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 56GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT04B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 306 292 286 290 284 283 MB/s Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	83.7% Excellent	Read 490 Write 313 Mixed 298 SusWrite 290 78% 348 MB/s	4K Read 30 4K Write 72.3 4K Mixed 30.3 123% 44.2 MB/s	DQ Read 237 DQ Write 175 DQ Mixed 172 138% 195 MB/s
Poor: 70% ↑ This bench: 83.7% Great: 127%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$51 481,221 User benchmarks, average bench 106% 18GB free Firmware: RVT04B6Q Relative performance n/a - sequential bench incomplete		Read 416 Write 414 Mixed 422 93% 417 MB/s	4K Read 31.7 4K Write 72.1 4K Mixed 46.7 146% 50.2 MB/s	DQ Read 234 DQ Write 178 DQ Mixed 201 152% 204 MB/s
Poor: 74% Great: 130%
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016)-$85 78,258 User benchmarks, average bench 95% 50GB free Firmware: CC26 SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 114 113 114 97 114 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	63.7% Good	Read 112 Write 80 Mixed 68.8 SusWrite 110 68% 92.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.7 130% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 63.7% Great: 115%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$79 84,877 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 24GB free Firmware: 0001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 90 74 80 47 88 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	42.2% Average	Read 70.5 Write 87 Mixed 65.7 SusWrite 76.4 55% 74.9 MB/s	4K Read 1.3 4K Write 0.5 4K Mixed 0 63% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 42.2% Great: 91%
WD Blue 4TB (2015)-$90 84,523 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 27GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 95 97 99 96 90 97 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	53.2% Above average	Read 89.3 Write 93.5 Mixed 72.3 SusWrite 95.8 65% 87.7 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 1 194% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 53.2% Great: 103%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair CMU16GX4M2C3000C15 CMW16GX4M2C3000C15 CMU16GX4M2C3000C15 CMW16GX4M2C3000C15 32GB 24 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 2800, 2800, 2800, 2800 MHz 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	98.7% Outstanding	MC Read 38.2 MC Write 34.4 MC Mixed 33.9 101% 35.5 GB/s	SC Read 26.4 SC Write 35.6 SC Mixed 30.4 88% 30.8 GB/s	Latency 74.8 54% 74.8 ns
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 98.7% Great: 99%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money.

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS Builds (Compare 15,855 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.

Gaming 105%

UFO

Desktop 94%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 107%

UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS - $169

CPU
Ryzen 7 3700XAMD $329Bench 87%, 450,504 samples	4,910x
Ryzen 5 3600AMD $198Bench 84%, 703,010 samples	2,743x
Ryzen 9 3900XAMD $544Bench 89%, 188,169 samples	2,395x

GPU
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $510Bench 118%, 401,550 samples	2,010x
RX 5700-XTAMD $400Bench 107%, 302,536 samples	1,984x
RTX 2080S (Super)Nvidia $770Bench 137%, 148,615 samples	810x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $85Bench 287%, 246,585 samples	968x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $130Bench 307%, 197,148 samples	641x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $65Bench 271%, 313,524 samples	620x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $79Bench 85%, 360,684 samples	1,003x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $95Bench 85%, 188,132 samples	574x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GBCorsair $150Bench 89%, 70,944 samples	404x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 68% - Good

Total price: $1,172

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-9600K $208	Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400	Crucial MX500 250GB $47
Intel Core i5-10600K $257	Nvidia RTX 3070 $500	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i5-10400F $161	Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $40

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $45	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $79	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $71	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16