Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 55%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 54%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics57.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive83.7% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Very high background CPU (51%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
1 month ago, 1 month ago.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory26.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200401
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 30 '20 at 00:56
Run Duration172 Seconds
Run User MAR-User
Background CPU 51%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (37th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X-$270
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
84.4% Excellent
Memory 83.2
1-Core 116
2-Core 228
82% 143 Pts
4-Core 460
8-Core 812
80% 636 Pts
64-Core 1,201
81% 1,201 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 84.4%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$290
Asus(1043 854A) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 456.55
Performing below potential (63rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
57.1% Above average
Lighting 71.3
Reflection 73.9
Parallax 74.7
58% 73.3 fps
MRender 66.8
Gravity 70.7
Splatting 66.5
57% 68 fps
Poor: 53%
This bench: 57.1%
Great: 61%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$40
56GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 306 292 286 290 284 283 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
83.7% Excellent
Read 490
Write 313
Mixed 298
SusWrite 290
78% 348 MB/s
4K Read 30
4K Write 72.3
4K Mixed 30.3
123% 44.2 MB/s
DQ Read 237
DQ Write 175
DQ Mixed 172
138% 195 MB/s
Poor: 70%
This bench: 83.7%
Great: 127%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$51
18GB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential bench incomplete
Read 416
Write 414
Mixed 422
93% 417 MB/s
4K Read 31.7
4K Write 72.1
4K Mixed 46.7
146% 50.2 MB/s
DQ Read 234
DQ Write 178
DQ Mixed 201
152% 204 MB/s
Poor: 74% Great: 130%
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016)-$85
50GB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 114 113 114 97 114 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
63.7% Good
Read 112
Write 80
Mixed 68.8
SusWrite 110
68% 92.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.7
130% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 63.7%
Great: 115%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$79
24GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 90 74 80 47 88 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
42.2% Average
Read 70.5
Write 87
Mixed 65.7
SusWrite 76.4
55% 74.9 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0
63% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 42.2%
Great: 91%
WD Blue 4TB (2015)-$90
27GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 95 97 99 96 90 97 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
53.2% Above average
Read 89.3
Write 93.5
Mixed 72.3
SusWrite 95.8
65% 87.7 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 1
194% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 53.2%
Great: 103%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Corsair CMU16GX4M2C3000C15 CMW16GX4M2C3000C15 CMU16GX4M2C3000C15 CMW16GX4M2C3000C15 32GB
2800, 2800, 2800, 2800 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
98.7% Outstanding
MC Read 38.2
MC Write 34.4
MC Mixed 33.9
101% 35.5 GB/s
SC Read 26.4
SC Write 35.6
SC Mixed 30.4
88% 30.8 GB/s
Latency 74.8
54% 74.8 ns
Poor: 71%
This bench: 98.7%
Great: 99%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS Builds (Compare 15,855 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 105%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 107%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS - $169

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 68% - Good Total price: $1,172
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9600K $208Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Crucial MX500 250GB $47
Intel Core i5-10600K $257Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i5-10400F $161Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $40
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $45Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $79SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $71SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback