Asus X99-A

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 108%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 94%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics127% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (43%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus X99-A  (all builds)
Memory26.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180420
Uptime16.1 Days
Run DateNov 29 '20 at 23:51
Run Duration170 Seconds
Run User SWE-User
Background CPU 43%

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-5820K-$130
SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
85.5% Excellent
Memory 96
1-Core 91.4
2-Core 223
78% 137 Pts
4-Core 405
8-Core 676
66% 540 Pts
64-Core 762
47% 762 Pts
Poor: 68%
This bench: 85.5%
Great: 88%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080S (Super)-$466
Asus(1043 8711) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3875 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 451.67
Performing below potential (29th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
127% Outstanding
Lighting 169
Reflection 161
Parallax 161
138% 164 fps
MRender 190
Gravity 157
Splatting 129
127% 159 fps
Poor: 116%
This bench: 127%
Great: 139%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43
71GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,416
Write 1,260
Mixed 1174
286% 1,283 MB/s
4K Read 55.1
4K Write 122
4K Mixed 74.1
243% 83.7 MB/s
DQ Read 839
DQ Write 649
DQ Mixed 773
571% 754 MB/s
Poor: 178% Great: 355%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
16GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 452
Write 408
Mixed 364
91% 408 MB/s
4K Read 35.2
4K Write 75.9
4K Mixed 45.2
151% 52.1 MB/s
DQ Read 378
DQ Write 337
DQ Mixed 356
268% 357 MB/s
Poor: 72% Great: 124%
Toshiba X300 4TB-$146
32GB free
Firmware: FP2A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 98 101 100 102 101 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
57.2% Above average
Read 98.3
Write 102
Mixed 50.8
SusWrite 100
64% 87.8 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 1
202% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 57.2%
Great: 104%
Samsung Spinpoint T166 500GB-$40
76GB free
Firmware: CR100-12
SusWrite @10s intervals: 52 52 52 53 52 52 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
29.4% Poor
Read 50.2
Write 55.5
Mixed 36.7
SusWrite 52.2
36% 48.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.7
123% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 29.4%
Great: 44%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GB
4 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 3264 MHz
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
113% Outstanding
MC Read 42.4
MC Write 44.2
MC Mixed 43.5
124% 43.4 GB/s
SC Read 15.9
SC Write 21.4
SC Mixed 23.2
58% 20.2 GB/s
Latency 54.1
74% 54.1 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 113%
Great: 119%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X99-A Builds (Compare 1,980 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 45%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 41%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Asus X99-A - $240

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 66% - Good Total price: $763
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback