PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
Graphics | 31.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 31.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Gigabyte GA-B75M-D3H (all builds) |
Memory | 10.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20131023 |
Uptime | 0.9 Days |
Run Date | Nov 29 '20 at 20:35 |
Run Duration | 149 Seconds |
Run User | ESP-User |
Background CPU | 6% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i5-3470-$59
Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-3470 CPU @ 3.20GHz, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg)
|
78.7%
Very good
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 960-$198
Gigabyte(1458 36D2) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1430 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 457.30
Performing below potential (46th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
31.5%
Below average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
SanDisk SSD Plus 240GB-$28
92GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Z33130RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 64 78 82 71 63 MB/s
|
31.2%
Below average
|
|||
Samsung 840 Evo 500GB-$150
377GB free
Firmware: EXT0AB0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 151 202 206 208 207 208 MB/s
|
57.5%
Above average
|
|||
WD Green 1TB (2010)-$139
292GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 45 46 46 48 47 47 MB/s
|
27%
Poor
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
HyperX Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (10th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
33.8%
Below average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples | 871x |
Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples | 596x |
Core i5-3570IntelBench 65%, 104,858 samples | 355x |
GPU | |
---|---|
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples | 375x |
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 252x |
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 182x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 64% - Good | Total price: $405 |