Acer Predator PO3-600

Performance Results


Gaming 77% Battleship	Desktop 95% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 69% Battle cruiser


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 93.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	79.8% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	169% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (34%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago.

System	Acer Predator PO3-600 (all builds)
Motherboard	Acer Predator PO3-600
Memory	9.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit farger
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190416
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	Nov 29 '20 at 18:45
Run Duration	129 Seconds
Run User	NOR-User
Background CPU	34%

Watch Gameplay: 2060 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-9700-$260 79,875 User benchmarks, average bench 92% U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (46^th percentile)	93.2% Outstanding	Memory 90 1-Core 131 2-Core 274 91% 165 Pts	4-Core 518 8-Core 811 82% 665 Pts	64-Core 926 57% 926 Pts
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 93.2% Great: 99%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060-$324 645,160 User benchmarks, average bench 90% Sapphire(174B A520) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 456.55 Performing below potential (6^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	79.8% Very good	Lighting 98.3 Reflection 94 Parallax 96.7 80% 96.3 fps	MRender 124 Gravity 90.4 Splatting 82.5 79% 99.1 fps
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 79.8% Great: 97%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G-1014 512GB 18,999 User benchmarks, average bench 168% 136GB free (System drive) Firmware: 20110000 SusWrite @10s intervals: 630 477 429 421 428 399 MB/s Performing as expected (51^st percentile)	169% Outstanding	Read 1,032 Write 1,145 Mixed 1,091 SusWrite 464 210% 933 MB/s	4K Read 37.8 4K Write 101 4K Mixed 52.4 178% 63.6 MB/s	DQ Read 1,075 DQ Write 919 DQ Mixed 1,022 759% 1,006 MB/s
Poor: 110% ↑ This bench: 169% Great: 213%
Seagate Expansion+ 1TB 4,125 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 547GB free Firmware: 9300 SusWrite @10s intervals: 41 41 41 42 41 41 MB/s Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)	21.7% Poor	Read 34 Write 40.3 Mixed 34 SusWrite 41.1 28% 37.3 MB/s	4K Read 1.2 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.6 141% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 21.7% Great: 71%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMA81GU6CJR8N-VK 2x8GB 9,970 User benchmarks, average bench 80% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz Performing below potential (17^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	71.3% Very good	MC Read 29.6 MC Write 26 MC Mixed 22.9 75% 26.2 GB/s	SC Read 14.1 SC Write 17.6 SC Mixed 17.9 47% 16.5 GB/s	Latency 67.3 60% 67.3 ns
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 71.3% Great: 93%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Predator PO3-600 Builds (Compare 2,605 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 86%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 94%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 78%

Battleship

System: Acer Predator PO3-600

CPU
Core i7-9700Intel $260Bench 92%, 79,875 samples	887x
Core i7-8700Intel $200Bench 87%, 349,567 samples	693x
Core i5-9400FIntel $102Bench 85%, 299,482 samples	572x

GPU
RTX 2060Nvidia $324Bench 90%, 645,160 samples	481x
RTX 2070Nvidia $200Bench 104%, 478,117 samples	439x
GTX 1660-TiNvidia $143Bench 76%, 318,562 samples	386x

SSD
PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G-1014 512GBWDCBench 168%, 18,999 samples	505x
RBUSNS8154P3256GJ1 256GBKingstonBench 100%, 13,793 samples	321x
HFM256GDJTNG-8310A 256GBBench 121%, 26,870 samples	166x

RAM
M378A1K43DB2-CTD 2x8GBSamsungBench 79%, 6,043 samples	491x
HMA81GU6CJR8N-VK 2x8GBHynixBench 80%, 9,970 samples	308x
ACR26D4U9S8ME-8 2x8GBKingstonBench 78%, 1,446 samples	194x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 78% - Very good

Total price: $584

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16