Asus X99-A/USB 3.1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 197%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 178%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics225% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus X99-A/USB 3.1  (all builds)
Memory56.5 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170810
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateNov 29 '20 at 12:50
Run Duration250 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-5820K-$130
SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
88.5% Excellent
Memory 89.5
1-Core 121
2-Core 242
85% 151 Pts
4-Core 470
8-Core 776
76% 623 Pts
64-Core 947
59% 947 Pts
Poor: 68%
This bench: 88.5%
Great: 88%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3090-$1,306
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 4875 MHz, Ram: 24GB, Driver: 457.30
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
225% Outstanding
Lighting 337
Reflection 428
Parallax 349
275% 371 fps
MRender 381
Gravity 271
Splatting 192
220% 281 fps
Poor: 185%
This bench: 225%
Great: 230%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 120GB-$85
3GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0AB0Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 466
Write 400
Mixed 296
86% 387 MB/s
4K Read 36
4K Write 83.4
4K Mixed 48.9
161% 56.1 MB/s
DQ Read 374
DQ Write 332
DQ Mixed 170
178% 292 MB/s
Poor: 63% Great: 108%
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$158
635GB free
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2185 2115 1139 1134 1139 1140 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
303% Outstanding
Read 2,510
Write 2163
Mixed 1,461
SusWrite 1,475
426% 1,902 MB/s
4K Read 59.8
4K Write 136
4K Mixed 81
266% 92.3 MB/s
DQ Read 726
DQ Write 600
DQ Mixed 670
500% 666 MB/s
Poor: 214%
This bench: 303%
Great: 372%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$109
23GB free
Firmware: EMT01B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 471
Write 458
Mixed 371
97% 433 MB/s
4K Read 40.6
4K Write 91.3
4K Mixed 56.9
183% 62.9 MB/s
DQ Read 379
DQ Write 331
DQ Mixed 351
264% 354 MB/s
Poor: 80% Great: 134%
WD Blue 2.5" 500GB (2013)
37GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 63 64 66 65 65 65 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
34.5% Below average
Read 55
Write 60.7
Mixed 40.2
SusWrite 64.8
41% 55.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.7
136% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 34.5%
Great: 63%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$35
36GB free
Firmware: 15.01H15
SusWrite @10s intervals: 91 90 83 79 89 98 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
53.7% Above average
Read 98.5
Write 87.1
Mixed 63.4
SusWrite 88.4
62% 84.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.9
164% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 53.7%
Great: 69%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28
21GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 154 154 152 154 153 154 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
83% Excellent
Read 136
Write 110
Mixed 73.5
SusWrite 154
87% 118 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 1
178% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 83%
Great: 112%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMW32GX4M2C3200C16 4x16GB
4 of 8 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 2666 MHz clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
118% Outstanding
MC Read 46.9
MC Write 44.5
MC Mixed 46.7
132% 46 GB/s
SC Read 17.6
SC Write 22
SC Mixed 25.3
62% 21.6 GB/s
Latency 67.9
59% 67.9 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 118%
Great: 123%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X99-A/USB 3.1 Builds (Compare 1,283 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 65%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 57%
Gunboat

Motherboard: Asus X99-A/USB 3.1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 91% - Outstanding Total price: $371
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback