Asrock 970 Extreme3 R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 33%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics45.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive79.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsrock 970 Extreme3 R2.0  (all builds)
Memory20.1 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160531
Uptime1 Days
Run DateNov 29 '20 at 12:44
Run Duration146 Seconds
Run User BEL-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8150-$770
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
66.2% Good
Memory 90.9
1-Core 68.7
2-Core 128
60% 95.9 Pts
4-Core 227
8-Core 382
37% 304 Pts
64-Core 379
24% 379 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 66.2%
Great: 66%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
CLim: 1455 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 432.00
Performing below potential (18th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
45.1% Average
Lighting 52.7
Reflection 77.6
Parallax 49.4
43% 59.9 fps
MRender 67.9
Gravity 60.2
Splatting 55.4
49% 61.2 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 45.1%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94
416GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 256 303 320 339 325 364 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
79.7% Very good
Read 397
Write 379
Mixed 316
SusWrite 318
79% 353 MB/s
4K Read 32.3
4K Write 59.6
4K Mixed 40.5
132% 44.1 MB/s
DQ Read 41.2
DQ Write 91.3
DQ Mixed 54.2
45% 62.2 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 79.7%
Great: 134%
Kingston A400 480GB-$38
447GB free
Firmware: SBFK61K1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 135 159 171 168 151 75 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
55.5% Above average
Read 302
Write 357
Mixed 272
SusWrite 143
60% 268 MB/s
4K Read 24.9
4K Write 55.3
4K Mixed 29.4
105% 36.5 MB/s
DQ Read 30.5
DQ Write 69.3
DQ Mixed 35.1
31% 45 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 55.5%
Great: 102%
Toshiba DT01ACA300 3TB-$80
2.5TB free
Firmware: MX6OABB0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 135 159 171 168 151 74 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
93.4% Outstanding
Read 183
Write 182
Mixed 35.9
SusWrite 143
98% 136 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.6
150% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 93.4%
Great: 107%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B5173DB0-CK0 F3-14900CL10-8GBXL M378B5173DB0-CK0 F3-14900CL10-8GBXL 24GB
1866, 1866, 1866, 1866 MHz
4096, 8192, 4096, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
51% Above average
MC Read 22.3
MC Write 14.2
MC Mixed 18.4
52% 18.3 GB/s
SC Read 9.3
SC Write 9.3
SC Mixed 14.4
31% 11 GB/s
Latency 66
61% 66 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 970 Extreme3 R2.0 Builds (Compare 463 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock 970 Extreme3 R2.0 - $300

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 80% - Very good Total price: $517
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback