MSI Z270 GAMING M6 AC (MS-7A78)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 33%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (17th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 83 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics34.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive56.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
1 month ago, 1 month ago.
SystemMSI MS-7A78
MotherboardMSI Z270 GAMING M6 AC (MS-7A78)  (all builds)
Memory11.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170331
Uptime10.1 Days
Run DateNov 29 '20 at 09:35
Run Duration193 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
Intel Core i7-7700K-$379
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
80.3% Excellent
Memory 84.2
1-Core 135
2-Core 256
90% 159 Pts
4-Core 411
8-Core 652
68% 532 Pts
64-Core 656
44% 656 Pts
Poor: 73%
This bench: 80.3%
Great: 97%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$340
CLim: 1531 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 432.00
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
34.3% Below average
Lighting 43.9
Reflection 47.4
Parallax 43.7
36% 45 fps
MRender 45.8
Gravity 39.8
Splatting 39.6
33% 41.7 fps
Poor: 45%
This bench: 34.3%
Great: 56%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$40
97GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 201 179 165 161 173 165 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
56.1% Above average
Read 378
Write 249
Mixed 8.2
SusWrite 174
45% 202 MB/s
4K Read 11.1
4K Write 13
4K Mixed 20.4
50% 14.8 MB/s
DQ Read 360
DQ Write 276
DQ Mixed 210
186% 282 MB/s
Poor: 70%
This bench: 56.1%
Great: 129%
Samsung 750 EVO 250GB-$100
118GB free
Firmware: MAT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 238 213 183 177 193 186 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
74% Very good
Read 373
Write 348
Mixed 238
SusWrite 198
65% 289 MB/s
4K Read 28.2
4K Write 34.5
4K Mixed 30.9
101% 31.2 MB/s
DQ Read 375
DQ Write 327
DQ Mixed 333
254% 345 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 74%
Great: 118%
Samsung 850 Pro 256GB-$200
238GB free
Firmware: EXM04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 237 222 185 179 213 186 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
71.2% Very good
Read 499
Write 444
Mixed 288
SusWrite 204
80% 359 MB/s
4K Read 8.6
4K Write 27.7
4K Mixed 31.7
68% 22.7 MB/s
DQ Read 381
DQ Write 331
DQ Mixed 329
254% 347 MB/s
Poor: 73%
This bench: 71.2%
Great: 124%
Samsung 750 EVO 250GB-$100
93GB free
Firmware: MAT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 236 195 180 176 192 187 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
84% Excellent
Read 423
Write 392
Mixed 299
SusWrite 194
73% 327 MB/s
4K Read 29.9
4K Write 69.1
4K Mixed 36.6
129% 45.2 MB/s
DQ Read 380
DQ Write 314
DQ Mixed 327
250% 340 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 84%
Great: 118%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$28
249GB free
Firmware: MS2OA750
SusWrite @10s intervals: 128 139 140 139 137 140 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
82.4% Excellent
Read 150
Write 106
Mixed 32.6
SusWrite 137
77% 106 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.6
135% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 82.4%
Great: 107%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB-$71
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
67.9% Good
MC Read 26.3
MC Write 26.8
MC Mixed 20.4
70% 24.5 GB/s
SC Read 17.2
SC Write 19.9
SC Mixed 17.3
52% 18.1 GB/s
Latency 73.1
55% 73.1 ns
Poor: 60%
This bench: 67.9%
Great: 104%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical Z270 GAMING M6 AC (MS-7A78) Builds (Compare 377 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 96%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 82%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: MSI Z270 GAMING M6 AC (MS-7A78)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 65% - Good Total price: $1,009
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-10600K $257Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Crucial MX500 250GB $47
Intel Core i5-9600K $200Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i5-10400F $161Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $40
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $43Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $79SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $71SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback