Asus TUF Z370-PLUS GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 84%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 74%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics105% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF Z370-PLUS GAMING  (all builds)
Memory12.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180702
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 29 '20 at 05:51
Run Duration171 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8700K-$186
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
80% Excellent
Memory 78.9
1-Core 143
2-Core 294
92% 172 Pts
4-Core 448
8-Core 575
65% 512 Pts
64-Core 877
54% 877 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 80%
Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$400
CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 457.30
Performing below potential (79th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
105% Outstanding
Lighting 132
Reflection 145
Parallax 147
108% 141 fps
MRender 118
Gravity 140
Splatting 125
104% 128 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 105%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Pro 256GB-$190
5GB free (System drive)
Firmware: DXM06B0Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 468
Write 159
Mixed 242
63% 290 MB/s
4K Read 26.7
4K Write 107
4K Mixed 43.6
153% 59.2 MB/s
DQ Read 377
DQ Write 214
DQ Mixed 146
149% 246 MB/s
Poor: 68% Great: 116%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
100GB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 445 317 308 305 306 304 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
127% Outstanding
Read 518
Write 486
Mixed 468
SusWrite 331
101% 451 MB/s
4K Read 46.5
4K Write 135
4K Mixed 65
225% 82.2 MB/s
DQ Read 384
DQ Write 343
DQ Mixed 359
270% 362 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 127%
Great: 129%
WDC WDS500G2B0A-00SM50 500GB
393GB free
Firmware: 401000WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 431 423 426 421 418 421 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
117% Outstanding
Read 501
Write 434
Mixed 271
SusWrite 423
91% 408 MB/s
4K Read 43
4K Write 105
4K Mixed 47.2
181% 65 MB/s
DQ Read 386
DQ Write 320
DQ Mixed 160
172% 288 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 117%
Great: 111%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$130
482GB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 482 487 491 494 495 495 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
131% Outstanding
Read 509
Write 449
Mixed 445
SusWrite 490
107% 473 MB/s
4K Read 47.1
4K Write 115
4K Mixed 60.1
209% 74.1 MB/s
DQ Read 385
DQ Write 343
DQ Mixed 361
272% 363 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 131%
Great: 133%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
PNY 8GBF1X08JEEE36-12-K 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
46.5% Average
MC Read 19.8
MC Write 18.6
MC Mixed 14.9
51% 17.8 GB/s
SC Read 4.6
SC Write 9.4
SC Mixed 3.9
17% 5.97 GB/s
Latency 82.7
48% 82.7 ns
Poor: 43%
This bench: 46.5%
Great: 89%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF Z370-PLUS GAMING Builds (Compare 4,311 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 93%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 85%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus TUF Z370-PLUS GAMING - $135

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 73% - Very good Total price: $844
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback