Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 69%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 65%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics74.1% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)  (all builds)
Memory24.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.4 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201124
Uptime0.9 Days
Run DateNov 29 '20 at 02:07
Run Duration234 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU3%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3600X-$210
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
85.8% Excellent
Memory 80.8
1-Core 152
2-Core 297
95% 177 Pts
4-Core 487
8-Core 845
81% 666 Pts
64-Core 1,024
63% 1,024 Pts
Poor: 74%
This bench: 85.8%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 456.55
Performing below potential (16th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
74.1% Very good
Lighting 91.3
Reflection 104
Parallax 91.8
74% 95.8 fps
MRender 88.5
Gravity 92
Splatting 88.6
73% 89.7 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 74.1%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Pcie SSD 1TB
80GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ECFM12.3 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,390
Write 2,089
Mixed 1,686
388% 1,722 MB/s
4K Read 42.6
4K Write 140
4K Mixed 57.4
212% 79.9 MB/s
DQ Read 1,195
DQ Write 988
DQ Mixed 1,094
818% 1,092 MB/s
Poor: 112% Great: 284%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94
180GB free
Firmware: EMT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 450 449 448 423 411 355 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
113% Outstanding
Read 496
Write 444
Mixed 377
SusWrite 422
98% 435 MB/s
4K Read 42.9
4K Write 91.5
4K Mixed 56.8
186% 63.7 MB/s
DQ Read 219
DQ Write 184
DQ Mixed 200
150% 201 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 113%
Great: 134%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37
342GB free
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 159 161 163 163 161 161 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
92.4% Outstanding
Read 160
Write 146
Mixed 72
SusWrite 161
99% 135 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1.2
238% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 92.4%
Great: 109%
WD Blue 1TB (2015)-$40
354GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 125 125 128 128 127 125 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
62.7% Good
Read 92
Write 100
Mixed 71.3
SusWrite 126
72% 97.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1
191% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 62.7%
Great: 87%
WD Black 2TB (2013)-$48
1TB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 178 177 178 178 178 178 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
101% Outstanding
Read 175
Write 180
Mixed 88.8
SusWrite 178
114% 156 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 3.3
4K Mixed 1
214% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 101%
Great: 112%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3600 C18 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3400 MHz
Performing below potential (32nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
92% Outstanding
MC Read 37.7
MC Write 25.1
MC Mixed 37.4
95% 33.4 GB/s
SC Read 24
SC Write 24.7
SC Mixed 32.7
78% 27.1 GB/s
Latency 79.1
50% 79.1 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 92%
Great: 126%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 25,802 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) - $192

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 98% - Outstanding Total price: $932
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback