| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
| Graphics | 40.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 82% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
| Motherboard | Gigabyte GA-P65 (all builds) |
| Memory | 8.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20170821 |
| Uptime | 0.8 Days |
| Run Date | Nov 29 '20 at 01:30 |
| Run Duration | 113 Seconds |
| Run User | USA-User |
| Background CPU | 10% |
PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
|
61.2%
Good
|
59% 101 Pts
|
42% 333 Pts
|
26% 419 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 1060 (Mobile)
Gigabyte(1458 1650) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 22.21.13.8266
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
40.2%
Average
|
38% 57.8 fps
|
44% 53.6 fps
| |
| Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Crucial MX300 SATA M.2 525GB-$140
414GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M0CR060
SusWrite @10s intervals: 267 407 387 245 237 248 MB/s
|
82%
Excellent
|
84% 374 MB/s
|
107% 39 MB/s
|
243% 328 MB/s
|
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Crucial CT16G4SFD824A.C16FHD 1x16GB
1 of 4 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
|
40.3%
Average
|
39% 13.8 GB/s
|
36% 12.8 GB/s
|
42% 95.2 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical GA-P65 Builds (Compare 114 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-P65
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| HD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 310,249 samples | 64x |
| GTX 1060 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 47%, 177,775 samples | 49x |
| RTX 2060Nvidia $324Bench 90%, 645,160 samples | 1x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 15% - Very poor | Total price: $140 |