PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 1.81% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
Motherboard | Asus P7P55D PRO (all builds) |
Memory | 9.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 7 |
BIOS Date | 20101214 |
Uptime | 9.9 Days |
Run Date | Nov 29 '20 at 00:30 |
Run Duration | 214 Seconds |
Run User | CAN-User |
Background CPU | 13% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
66%
Good
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GeForce GT 610
Asus(1043 8408) 2GB
CLim: 810 MHz, MLim: 300 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 391.35
|
1.81%
Terrible
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Hitachi HTS725050A7E630 500GB-$125
91GB free (System drive)
Firmware: GH2OA420
SusWrite @10s intervals: 38 51 33 38 27 40 MB/s
|
39.6%
Below average
|
|||
Samsung Spinpoint F3 1TB-$83
194GB free
Firmware: 1AJ100E4
SusWrite @10s intervals: 34 65 55 72 61 35 MB/s
|
35.2%
Below average
|
|||
WD Green 1.5TB (2009)-$150
24GB free
Firmware: 01.00A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 44 50 34 32 14 32 MB/s
|
30%
Below average
|
|||
Samsung Spinpoint F3 1TB-$83
7GB free
Firmware: 1AJ100E4
SusWrite @10s intervals: 49 65 61 70 60 37 MB/s
|
34.5%
Below average
|
|||
SanDisk Extreme SSD 500GB
352GB free, PID 558c
SusWrite @10s intervals: 54 49 54 54 50 45 MB/s
|
147%
Outstanding
|
|||
Unigen PQS1000 1GB
1GB free, PID 1f73
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.9 3.9 3.8 3.9 3.8 4.3 MB/s
|
9.05%
Terrible
|
|||
Seagate Expansion Desk 8TB
152GB free, PID 3322
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 52 50 54 54 54 45 MB/s
|
42%
Average
|
|||
Seagate Expansion Desk 8TB
34GB free, PID 331a
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 50 49 52 51 50 44 MB/s
|
34.4%
Below average
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown 16GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
|
40.8%
Average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i7 860Intel $339Bench 64%, 51,451 samples | 104x |
Core i5-750Intel $75Bench 62%, 43,796 samples | 96x |
Core i7 870Intel $100Bench 66%, 37,228 samples | 47x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 13x |
GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples | 12x |
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 12x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 71% - Very good | Total price: $484 |