Asus ROG STRIX X570-F GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 209%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 108%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 238%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (80th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 20 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 106%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics201% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive397% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus ROG STRIX X570-F GAMING  (all builds)
Memory26.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201124
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateNov 28 '20 at 22:56
Run Duration300 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 3080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (80th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X-$249
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 4.7 GHz, turbo 4.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
106% Outstanding
Memory 91.6
1-Core 161
2-Core 322
104% 191 Pts
4-Core 642
8-Core 1,219
111% 930 Pts
64-Core 2,424
150% 2,424 Pts
Poor: 87%
This bench: 106%
Great: 108%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3080-$910
Asus(1043 87AC) ≥ 4GB; 3080 strix gaming oc
CLim: 2250 MHz, MLim: 4900 MHz, Ram: 10GB, Driver: 457.30
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
201% Outstanding
Lighting 302
Reflection 254
Parallax 312
246% 289 fps
MRender 304
Gravity 239
Splatting 174
189% 239 fps
Poor: 163%
This bench: 201%
Great: 202%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$76
866GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2636 2221 1487 1519 1491 1489 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
397% Outstanding
Read 2,755
Write 2650
Mixed 2,029
SusWrite 1,807
519% 2,310 MB/s
4K Read 73.9
4K Write 227
4K Mixed 107
370% 136 MB/s
DQ Read 1,466
DQ Write 1,324
DQ Mixed 1,378
1,038% 1,390 MB/s
Poor: 188%
This bench: 397%
Great: 410%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$150
1.5TB free
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2555 2552 2555 1740 1597 1619 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
408% Outstanding
Read 2,749
Write 2,523
Mixed 1,974
SusWrite 2103
525% 2,337 MB/s
4K Read 69.8
4K Write 185
4K Mixed 101
333% 119 MB/s
DQ Read 1524
DQ Write 1,440
DQ Mixed 1,464
1,104% 1,476 MB/s
Poor: 223%
This bench: 408%
Great: 435%
Samsung 860 Evo 2TB-$250
1.5TB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 453 453 453 454 454 455 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
118% Outstanding
Read 503
Write 451
Mixed 430
SusWrite 454
103% 459 MB/s
4K Read 45
4K Write 96.4
4K Mixed 60
196% 67.1 MB/s
DQ Read 220
DQ Write 186
DQ Mixed 201
151% 202 MB/s
Poor: 89%
This bench: 118%
Great: 133%
Seagate FireCuda SSHD 2TB (2016)-$79
1.5TB free
Firmware: CC41
SusWrite @10s intervals: 201 209 210 211 209 211 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
116% Outstanding
Read 196
Write 175
Mixed 28.5
SusWrite 208
109% 152 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 5.2
4K Mixed 1.9
353% 2.73 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 116%
Great: 110%
SanDisk Cruzer Glide 8GB
7GB free, PID 5575
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.2 3.1 3.2 3.2 3.2 2.6 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
7.17% Terrible
Read 22.8
Write 14.2
Mixed 15
SusWrite 3.2
17% 13.8 MB/s
4K Read 5.6
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 2.7
133% 2.97 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 7.17%
Great: 14%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3600 C16 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
130% Outstanding
MC Read 59.7
MC Write 43.7
MC Mixed 42.7
139% 48.7 GB/s
SC Read 32.5
SC Write 26.9
SC Mixed 40.3
95% 33.2 GB/s
Latency 64.8
62% 64.8 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 130%
Great: 134%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ROG STRIX X570-F GAMING Builds (Compare 4,563 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 184%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 201%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX X570-F GAMING

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 67% - Good Total price: $1,257
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $275Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback