PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (23rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 77 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 45.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 47.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications. |
Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asrock H61 Pro BTC (all builds) |
Memory | 4.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.1 GHz |
Display | 1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit väriä |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20140225 |
Uptime | 2.9 Days |
Run Date | Nov 28 '20 at 20:59 |
Run Duration | 142 Seconds |
Run User | FIN-User |
Background CPU | 42% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i5-3550-$335
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
|
64.4%
Good
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
AMD RX 580-$140
CLim: 1440 MHz, MLim: 2050 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 20.11.2
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
45.3%
Average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
18GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKB1D2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 132 42 66 77 30 70 MB/s
|
47.8%
Average
|
|||
Hitachi HTS545050A7E380 500GB
86GB free
Firmware: GG2OA6C0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 55 49 54 56 53 54 MB/s
|
38.4%
Below average
|
|||
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 32GB-$9
2GB free, PID 1666
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.4 7.7 1.2 3.7 11 MB/s
|
9.03%
Terrible
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
HyperX Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1067 MHz
|
35.1%
Below average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples | 9x |
Core i5-3470Intel $69Bench 63%, 223,595 samples | 8x |
Core i7-2600Intel $197Bench 67%, 185,630 samples | 6x |
GPU | |
---|---|
RX 580AMD $140Bench 52%, 360,351 samples | 6x |
GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples | 5x |
GTX 660-TiNvidia $362Bench 26%, 42,960 samples | 4x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 74% - Very good | Total price: $437 |