PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
Graphics | 17.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 35.5% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
Memory | 12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Gigabyte GA-B75M-D3H (all builds) |
Memory | 9.1 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20130227 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Nov 28 '20 at 17:08 |
Run Duration | 133 Seconds |
Run User | FRA-User |
Background CPU | 23% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Pentium G2030-$24
Intel(R) Pentium(R) CPU G2030 @ 3.00GHz, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
|
54.2%
Above average
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$92
Gigabyte(1458 3681) 2GB
CLim: 1293 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 432.00
|
17.1%
Very poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Sandisk PLUS 480GB
280GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UG4500RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 151 65 2.8 24 84 144 MB/s
|
35.5%
Below average
|
|||
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$35
195GB free
Firmware: 15.01H15
SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 12 13 12 13 13 MB/s
|
31.7%
Below average
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Kingston KHX1600C10D3/8G KHX1600C9D3/4GX 12GB
1333, 1333 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (18th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
30.3%
Below average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples | 870x |
Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples | 596x |
Core i5-3570IntelBench 65%, 104,858 samples | 355x |
GPU | |
---|---|
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples | 375x |
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 252x |
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 182x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 64% - Good | Total price: $405 |