PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (16th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 84 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 29.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 75.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asus SABERTOOTH X79 (all builds) |
Memory | 10.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20121225 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Nov 28 '20 at 13:44 |
Run Duration | 146 Seconds |
Run User | GBR-User |
Background CPU | 38% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i7-3930K-$250
LGA2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
|
61.2%
Good
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 388.13
Performing below potential (76th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
29.9%
Poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$140
509GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 324 338 359 395 396 409 MB/s
|
75.6%
Very good
|
|||
Toshiba DT01ACA300 3TB-$89
586GB free
Firmware: MX6OABB0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 92 97 93 88 84 78 MB/s
|
34.9%
Below average
|
|||
Seagate Backup+ Hub BK 6TB
975GB free
Firmware: D781
SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 27 27 29 28 29 MB/s
|
16%
Very poor
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Micron 16JTF1G64AZ-1G6E1 2x8GB
2 of 8 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
|
26.8%
Poor
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i7-3930KIntel $250Bench 74%, 33,172 samples | 432x |
Core i7-3820IntelBench 70%, 38,674 samples | 380x |
Core i7-4820KIntel $110Bench 72%, 23,169 samples | 295x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $499Bench 124%, 840,268 samples | 103x |
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 102x |
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples | 99x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 61% - Good | Total price: $1,164 |