Lenovo 20QN000YGE

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (98th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 2 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics29.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemLenovo 20QN000YGE  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 20QN000YGE
Memory24.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201027
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 28 '20 at 13:43
Run Duration91 Seconds
Run User SVN-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9850H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
90.5% Outstanding
Memory 93.1
1-Core 125
2-Core 234
86% 151 Pts
4-Core 474
8-Core 683
72% 578 Pts
64-Core 830
51% 830 Pts
Poor: 52%
This bench: 90.5%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro RTX 5000
Legend(17AA 2297) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 16GB, Driver: 443.32
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
29.2% Poor
Lighting 40.8
Reflection 84.2
Parallax 57.1
33% 60.7 fps
MRender 28.5
Gravity 49.7
Splatting 7
21% 28.4 fps
Poor: 67%
This bench: 29.2%
Great: 108%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLB512HBJQ-000L7 512GB
100GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3L2QEXF7
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2410
Write 2,341
Mixed 1,816
488% 2,189 MB/s
4K Read 60.5
4K Write 137
4K Mixed 83.4
271% 93.7 MB/s
DQ Read 1,080
DQ Write 834
DQ Mixed 938
707% 951 MB/s
Poor: 130% Great: 347%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A2K43DB1-CTD 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
89.1% Excellent
MC Read 32.9
MC Write 34.9
MC Mixed 26.9
90% 31.6 GB/s
SC Read 17.9
SC Write 37.7
SC Mixed 26.8
78% 27.5 GB/s
Latency 62
64% 62 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 89.1%
Great: 89%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback