Asus MAXIMUS IX FORMULA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 100%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 88%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics120% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus MAXIMUS IX FORMULA  (all builds)
Memory27.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20161108
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 28 '20 at 12:32
Run Duration151 Seconds
Run User DNK-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700K-$250
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.6 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
83.1% Excellent
Memory 84.6
1-Core 143
2-Core 255
90% 161 Pts
4-Core 439
8-Core 700
70% 570 Pts
64-Core 736
46% 736 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 83.1%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 456.38
Performing below potential (33rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
120% Outstanding
Lighting 163
Reflection 175
Parallax 167
133% 168 fps
MRender 125
Gravity 167
Splatting 119
111% 137 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 120%
Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45
19GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,814
Write 926
Mixed 568
241% 1,102 MB/s
4K Read 43.6
4K Write 82.5
4K Mixed 48.2
172% 58.1 MB/s
DQ Read 1208
DQ Write 524
DQ Mixed 248
347% 660 MB/s
Poor: 142% Great: 236%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$109
302GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 439 454 471 483 485 485 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
118% Outstanding
Read 470
Write 464
Mixed 396
SusWrite 469
102% 450 MB/s
4K Read 42.3
4K Write 77.3
4K Mixed 53.1
173% 57.6 MB/s
DQ Read 384
DQ Write 338
DQ Mixed 356
268% 359 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 118%
Great: 134%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$109
227GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 432 393 398 436 467 426 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
107% Outstanding
Read 496
Write 454
Mixed 298
SusWrite 425
94% 418 MB/s
4K Read 33.2
4K Write 80.8
4K Mixed 42.1
147% 52 MB/s
DQ Read 381
DQ Write 342
DQ Mixed 279
232% 334 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 107%
Great: 134%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 4133 C19 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
70.8% Very good
MC Read 25.3
MC Write 27.1
MC Mixed 22.1
71% 24.8 GB/s
SC Read 17.8
SC Write 27.4
SC Mixed 22.1
64% 22.4 GB/s
Latency 72.5
55% 72.5 ns
Poor: 69%
This bench: 70.8%
Great: 133%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MAXIMUS IX FORMULA Builds (Compare 1,520 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 106%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 91%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Asus MAXIMUS IX FORMULA - $378

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 63% - Good Total price: $1,222
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback