Asus Crosshair IV Formula

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 41.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	43.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus Crosshair IV Formula (all builds)
Memory	5.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20121009
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Nov 28 '20 at 05:16
Run Duration	158 Seconds
Run User	ROU-User
Background CPU	0%

Watch Gameplay: 570 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (41^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Sempron 145-$50 3,678 User benchmarks, average bench 36% AM3, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 1 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	41.7% Average	Memory 77.5 1-Core 38.9 2-Core 40.3 39% 52.2 Pts	4-Core 38.4 8-Core 40.8 5% 39.6 Pts	64-Core 40.5 2% 40.5 Pts
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 41.7% Great: 44%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 570-$130 473,685 User benchmarks, average bench 45% Sapphire(1DA2 E366) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1340 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 20.8.1 Performing below potential (35^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	43.4% Average	Lighting 55 Reflection 58.5 Parallax 69.5 45% 61 fps	MRender 50.5 Gravity 58.2 Splatting 42.4 40% 50.4 fps
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 43.4% Great: 49%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 120GB-$80 69,224 User benchmarks, average bench 96% 10GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT0 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 343 Write 302 Mixed 278 68% 308 MB/s	4K Read 17.8 4K Write 52.5 4K Mixed 27.2 90% 32.5 MB/s	DQ Read 176 DQ Write 194 DQ Mixed 213 152% 194 MB/s
Poor: 64% Great: 115%
SanDisk Ultra USB 3.0 32GB 4,649 User benchmarks, average bench 26% 26GB free, PID null SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 12 13 12 12 12 MB/s Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	11.9% Very poor	Read 24.2 Write 13 Mixed 16.7 SusWrite 12 21% 16.5 MB/s	4K Read 2.5 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 1.6 122% 1.93 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 11.9% Great: 40%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown F3-2400C9-4GTXD F3-2400C9-4GTXD 8GB 18 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing below potential (32^nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	25.1% Poor	MC Read 7.8 MC Write 7 MC Mixed 9.2 23% 8 GB/s	SC Read 6.2 SC Write 6.8 SC Mixed 9.3 21% 7.43 GB/s	Latency 85.3 47% 85.3 ns
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 25.1% Great: 53%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Crosshair IV Formula Builds (Compare 280 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 32%

Sail boat

Desktop 65%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 25%

Raft

Motherboard: Asus Crosshair IV Formula

CPU
Phenom II X6 1090TAMD $240Bench 57%, 23,506 samples	120x
Phenom II X6 1100TAMD $340Bench 59%, 12,769 samples	34x
Phenom II X4 965AMD $144Bench 53%, 43,442 samples	31x

GPU
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	15x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	12x
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	10x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	18x
INTENSO 240GBBench 77%, 887 samples	8x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	7x

RAM
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBCorsairBench 53%, 34,385 samples	8x
F3-16000CL9-2GBRH F3-16000CL9-2GBRH F3-16000CL9-2GBRH F3-16000CL9-2GBRH 8GBUnknownBench 39%, 26 samples	5x
F3-10666CL9-4GBRL F3-10666CL9-4GBRL 8GBUnknownBench 44%, 282 samples	5x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 54% - Above average

Total price: $520

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16