Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 9% Tree trunk	Desktop 67% Battle cruiser	Workstation 8% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	6.97% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing as expected (57^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-4870HQ 3,774 User benchmarks, average bench 66% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	76.2% Very good	Memory 77.1 1-Core 109 2-Core 210 74% 132 Pts	4-Core 415 8-Core 535 61% 475 Pts	64-Core 435 27% 435 Pts
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 76.2% Great: 76%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 750M 13,088 User benchmarks, average bench 8% Apple(106B 0130) 2GB CLim: 925 MHz, MLim: 1254 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 425.31 Performing as expected (45^th percentile)	6.97% Terrible	Lighting 7.6 Reflection 10.8 Parallax 10.5 6% 9.63 fps	MRender 11.6 Gravity 10.7 Splatting 9.3 8% 10.5 fps
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 6.97% Great: 9%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Apple SM0512F 500GB 287 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 21GB free (System drive) Firmware: UXM2JA1Q Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 583 Write 542 Mixed 428 115% 518 MB/s	4K Read 14.5 4K Write 61.1 4K Mixed 20.7 81% 32.1 MB/s	DQ Read 496 DQ Write 317 DQ Mixed 285 245% 366 MB/s
Poor: 60% Great: 99%
Lacie Mobile Drive 2TB 495 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 2TB free Firmware: 0003 SusWrite @10s intervals: 64 63 64 64 63 60 MB/s Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)	33.1% Below average	Read 52.7 Write 73 Mixed 84.4 SusWrite 62.7 51% 68.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 0.3 4K Mixed 1.3 188% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 33.1% Great: 69%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 0x31364B544631473634485A2D314736453120 2x8GB 1,320 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR3 1600 MHz Performing as expected (58^th percentile)	69.2% Good	MC Read 36.3 MC Write 20.8 MC Mixed 19.4 73% 25.5 GB/s	SC Read 14.4 SC Write 19.6 SC Mixed 18.2 50% 17.4 GB/s	Latency 86.1 46% 86.1 ns
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 69.2% Great: 75%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 12%

Tree trunk

Desktop 65%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 11%

Tree trunk

GPU
GeForce GT 750MNvidiaBench 8%, 13,088 samples	66x

SSD
SM0512F 500GBAppleBench 83%, 287 samples	31x
SM0512G PCIe 500GBAppleBench 162%, 1,474 samples	4x
SM0256G PCIe 251GBAppleBench 149%, 1,022 samples	2x

RAM
0x484D54343147533641465238412D50422020 2x8GBUnknownBench 63%, 311 samples	35x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	15x
0x 2x8GBUnknownBench 66%, 83 samples	14x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16