Performance Results


Gaming 3% Tree trunk	Desktop 24% Surfboard	Workstation 3% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (19th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 81 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 20.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	3.18% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	32.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Very high background CPU (70%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-2410M-$160 46,742 User benchmarks, average bench 48% CPU1, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 1 threads Base clock 2.3 GHz Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	20.3% Poor	Memory 36.1 1-Core 27.3 2-Core 28.5 21% 30.6 Pts	4-Core 28.6 8-Core 23.6 4% 26.1 Pts	64-Core 28.2 2% 28.2 Pts
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 20.3% Great: 58%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 540M 15,328 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Device(1854 0863) 2GB Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 9.18.13.3193 Performing as expected (58^th percentile)	3.18% Terrible	Lighting 3.7 Reflection 4.8 Parallax 2 3% 3.5 fps	MRender 5.8 Gravity 4.4 Splatting 3.2 4% 4.47 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 3.18% Great: 3%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28 424,288 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 148GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFK71E0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 241 145 57 18 68 62 MB/s Performing below potential (5^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	32.6% Below average	Read 89.1 Write 114 Mixed 101 SusWrite 98.6 23% 101 MB/s	4K Read 14.1 4K Write 23.2 4K Mixed 19.3 58% 18.9 MB/s	DQ Read 112 DQ Write 90.1 DQ Mixed 103 77% 102 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 32.6% Great: 100%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown HMT351S6BFR8C-H9 HMT325S6BFR8C-H9 6GB 98 User benchmarks, average bench 35% 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 2048 MB Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	18.3% Very poor	MC Read 6.8 MC Write 5.8 MC Mixed 6.5 18% 6.37 GB/s	SC Read 3.9 SC Write 4.9 SC Mixed 7.3 15% 5.37 GB/s	Latency 221 18% 221 ns
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 18.3% Great: 48%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16