PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
Graphics | 6.1% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks. |
Boot Drive | 40.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications. |
Memory | 64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
System | Lenovo 422911G (all builds) |
Motherboard | LENOVO LENOVO |
Memory | 58.8 GB free of 64 GB @ 1.1 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori, |
OS | Windows 7 |
BIOS Date | 20120426 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Nov 27 '20 at 14:02 |
Run Duration | 134 Seconds |
Run User | ITA-User |
Background CPU | 1% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2609 0
CPU 0, 2 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz
|
57.1%
Above average
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia Quadro 2000
Nvidia(10DE 084A) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 327.23
|
6.1%
Terrible
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 840 Pro 512GB-$129
241GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5B0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 151 156 140 148 157 149 MB/s
|
40.8%
Average
|
|||
WD Gold 2TB (2016)-$97
1.5TB free
Firmware: RR07
SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.1 7.2 7.2 6.9 6.7 7.1 MB/s
|
||||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung M393B2G70DB0- 4x16GB
4 of 16 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1066 MHz
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
38.3%
Below average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2609 01stBench 54%, 930 samples | 2x |
Xeon E5-2687W 0Intel $1,335Bench 74%, 868 samples | 1x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 650 Ti BoostNvidia $140Bench 17%, 15,701 samples | 1x |
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 1x |
RX 570AMD $130Bench 45%, 473,685 samples | 1x |
SSD | |
---|---|
MX200 250GBCrucial $134Bench 95%, 26,364 samples | 1x |
A400 120GBKingston $29Bench 61%, 166,392 samples | 1x |
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples | 1x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 20% - Very poor | Total price: $274 |