Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X509JA_F509JA

Performance Results


Gaming 18% Surfboard	Desktop 87% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 17% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (83rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 17 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	12.5% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	189% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

CPU throttled at 86% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.

System	Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X509JA_F509JA (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK X509JA
Memory	3.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20200611
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Nov 27 '20 at 13:56
Run Duration	129 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	2%
CPU Throttled	86%

PC Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-1065G7 58,314 User benchmarks, average bench 53% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 1.5 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	84.4% Excellent	Memory 81.2 1-Core 145 2-Core 280 92% 169 Pts	4-Core 476 8-Core 653 71% 564 Pts	64-Core 622 38% 622 Pts
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 84.4% Great: 70%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel Iris Plus G7 52,498 User benchmarks, average bench 9% Asus(1043 1EC1) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.7870 Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	12.5% Very poor	Lighting 14.8 Reflection 11.5 Parallax 16.3 12% 14.2 fps	MRender 16.4 Gravity 16.2 Splatting 16.4 13% 16.3 fps
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 12.5% Great: 13%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Nvme KINGSTON OM8PCP3512F-AB 512GB 560 User benchmarks, average bench 137% 423GB free (System drive) Firmware: ECFK52.3 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 897 924 932 928 930 929 MB/s Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	189% Outstanding	Read 940 Write 928 Mixed 821 SusWrite 923 204% 903 MB/s	4K Read 39.4 4K Write 170 4K Mixed 63.3 231% 91 MB/s	DQ Read 301 DQ Write 778 DQ Mixed 400 346% 493 MB/s
Poor: 69% ↑ This bench: 189% Great: 192%
Hitachi HTS547550A9E384 500GB-$60 23,997 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 167GB free Firmware: 0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 26 27 27 27 27 MB/s Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)	27.4% Poor	Read 68.9 Write 26.4 Mixed 28 SusWrite 26.6 28% 37.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 0.5 4K Mixed 0.4 74% 0.47 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 27.4% Great: 50%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 4ATF51264HZ-2G6E1 Hynix HMA851S6JJR6N-VK 8GB 1,256 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 2667, 2667 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	73.8% Very good	MC Read 31.1 MC Write 25.1 MC Mixed 21.4 74% 25.9 GB/s	SC Read 18.2 SC Write 30.9 SC Mixed 24.2 70% 24.4 GB/s	Latency 78.3 51% 78.3 ns
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 73.8% Great: 74%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X509JA_F509JA Builds (Compare 36 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 9%

Tree trunk

Desktop 55%

Gunboat

Workstation 9%

Tree trunk

System: Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X509JA_F509JA

CPU
Core i5-1035G1IntelBench 51%, 53,170 samples	22x
Core i3-1005G1IntelBench 44%, 22,960 samples	10x
Core i7-1065G7IntelBench 53%, 58,314 samples	4x

GPU
UHD G1IntelBench 5%, 68,603 samples	32x
Iris Plus G7IntelBench 9%, 52,498 samples	4x

SSD
PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G-1202 512GBWDCBench 155%, 2,132 samples	14x
HFM256GDJTNG-8310A 256GBBench 121%, 26,870 samples	8x
HFM256GDJTNG-8310A 256GBNvmeBench 126%, 183 samples	6x

RAM
M471A5244CB0-CTD Hynix HMA851S6JJR6N-VK 8GBSamsungBench 58%, 6,259 samples	19x
M471A5244CB0-CTD 1x4GBSamsungBench 30%, 48,985 samples	5x
M471A5244CB0-CTD 2x4GBSamsungBench 60%, 54,777 samples	5x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16