| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 35.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor. |
| Graphics | 0.54% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
| Memory | 4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
| Motherboard | Asrock Q1900B-ITX (all builds) |
| Memory | 1.4 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20160317 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Nov 27 '20 at 12:32 |
| Run Duration | 144 Seconds |
| Run User | ITA-User |
| Background CPU | 3% |
PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Celeron J1900
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
|
35.8%
Below average
|
29% 41.6 Pts
|
12% 89.5 Pts
|
6% 89.4 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail 0.667 - 0.854 GHz)
ASRock(1849 0F31) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4358
|
0.54%
Terrible
|
0% 0.67 fps
|
1% 1.17 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Toshiba DT01ACA050 500GB-$25
405GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MS1OA750
SusWrite @10s intervals: 153 160 137 123 73 126 MB/s
|
85.6%
Excellent
|
89% 123 MB/s
|
135% 1.1 MB/s
| |
|
SanDisk Cruzer Force 16GB
4GB free, PID 557d
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.6 2.3 5.2 5.9 6.5 5.4 MB/s
|
9%
Terrible
|
12% 10.1 MB/s
|
120% 2.3 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Crucial CT51264BF160BJ.C8F 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (40th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
20.6%
Poor
|
21% 7.37 GB/s
|
11% 3.97 GB/s
|
29% 138 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical Q1900B-ITX Builds (Compare 38 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asrock Q1900B-ITX
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| HD Graphics (Bay Trail 0.667 - 0.854 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 90,156 samples | 37x |
| Atom Processor E3800 Series/Celeron Processor N2920/J1900IntelBench 1%, 300 samples | 1x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 11% - Very poor | Total price: $35 |