| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
| Graphics | 25.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
| Motherboard | Asus P5N-D (all builds) |
| Memory | 4.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.8 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20100621 |
| Uptime | 0.1 Days |
| Run Date | Nov 27 '20 at 04:47 |
| Run Duration | 124 Seconds |
| Run User | USA-User |
| Background CPU | 3% |
PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core2 Quad Q9650-$170
Socket 775, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 2.85 GHz (avg)
|
52.4%
Above average
|
45% 68.3 Pts
|
21% 151 Pts
|
10% 162 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 1050-$101
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 457.30
Performing below potential (73rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
25.9%
Poor
|
26% 34.1 fps
|
25% 31.5 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$50
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 53 50 105 113 144 126 MB/s
|
71.8%
Very good
|
82% 112 MB/s
|
189% 1.4 MB/s
| |
|
Hitachi HDS721010CLA 1TB-$54
332GB free
Firmware: JP4O
SusWrite @10s intervals: 109 102 115 118 121 116 MB/s
|
64.2%
Good
|
69% 94 MB/s
|
157% 1 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR2
Performing below potential (23rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
16.9%
Very poor
|
13% 4.63 GB/s
|
18% 6.17 GB/s
|
47% 85.8 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical P5N-D Builds (Compare 90 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus P5N-D
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core2 Quad Q6600Intel $100Bench 42%, 59,658 samples | 20x |
| Core2 Quad Q9650Intel $170Bench 51%, 16,719 samples | 18x |
| Core2 Quad Q9550Intel $161Bench 49%, 34,093 samples | 7x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 660-TiNvidia $362Bench 26%, 42,960 samples | 7x |
| GeForce 9800 GTXNvidiaBench 8%, 3,983 samples | 7x |
| GeForce 9600 GTNvidiaBench 4%, 20,826 samples | 5x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 24% - Poor | Total price: $491 |