Asrock AB350M Pro4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 136%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 97%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 128%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 91.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics149% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive120% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsrock AB350M Pro4  (all builds)
Memory29 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190703
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 27 '20 at 01:33
Run Duration258 Seconds
Run User FIN-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 3070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3600-$84
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
91.7% Outstanding
Memory 75.9
1-Core 148
2-Core 294
92% 173 Pts
4-Core 576
8-Core 943
93% 760 Pts
64-Core 1,068
66% 1,068 Pts
Poor: 73%
This bench: 91.7%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3070-$400
Asus(1043 87BC) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 457.09
Performing below potential (52nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
149% Outstanding
Lighting 218
Reflection 204
Parallax 193
178% 205 fps
MRender 192
Gravity 151
Splatting 133
127% 159 fps
Poor: 135%
This bench: 149%
Great: 158%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
75GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 373 216 208 205 199 190 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
120% Outstanding
Read 506
Write 492
Mixed 405
SusWrite 232
92% 409 MB/s
4K Read 48.1
4K Write 130
4K Mixed 65
225% 80.9 MB/s
DQ Read 377
DQ Write 353
DQ Mixed 359
271% 363 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 120%
Great: 124%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$95
931GB free
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2668 2231 1530 1559 1559 1559 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
388% Outstanding
Read 2,708
Write 2,651
Mixed 2,015
SusWrite 1,851
518% 2,306 MB/s
4K Read 68.2
4K Write 186
4K Mixed 98.4
328% 118 MB/s
DQ Read 1,528
DQ Write 1,370
DQ Mixed 1438
1,081% 1,445 MB/s
Poor: 188%
This bench: 388%
Great: 410%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$39
289GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 140 142 139 143 142 141 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
84.4% Excellent
Read 153
Write 157
Mixed 78
SusWrite 141
97% 132 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.7
139% 1 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 84.4%
Great: 113%
Seagate Backup+ Desk 3TB
501GB free
Firmware: 0342
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 177
127% 177 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 6.8
4K Mixed 0.8
252% 2.83 MB/s
Poor: 14% Great: 110%
WD My Passport 25E1 2TB
1TB free, PID 25e1
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 90 90 91 91 90 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
38.9% Below average
Read 93.4
Write 94
Mixed 55.2
SusWrite 90.4
112% 83.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.8
90% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 38.9%
Great: 61%
SAMSUNG HD103SI 1TB
622GB free, PID 0370
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 40 40 40 40 40 40 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
19.4% Very poor
Read 38.3
Write 26.5
Mixed 36
SusWrite 40.3
48% 35.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
81% 1 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 19.4%
Great: 20%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
79.9% Very good
MC Read 32.8
MC Write 20.4
MC Mixed 32.5
82% 28.6 GB/s
SC Read 23.7
SC Write 19.9
SC Mixed 33.1
73% 25.6 GB/s
Latency 88.4
45% 88.4 ns
Poor: 50%
This bench: 79.9%
Great: 165%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical AB350M Pro4 Builds (Compare 1,409 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 45%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 42%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Asrock AB350M Pro4 - $88

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 85% - Excellent Total price: $458
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback