Gigabyte X570 AORUS MASTER

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 190%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 215%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 98.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics194% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive307% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardGigabyte X570 AORUS MASTER  (all builds)
Memory56.6 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200907
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 26 '20 at 22:41
Run Duration409 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 3080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X-$395
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
98.7% Outstanding
Memory 88.3
1-Core 152
2-Core 304
98% 181 Pts
4-Core 584
8-Core 1,181
104% 882 Pts
64-Core 2,168
134% 2,168 Pts
Poor: 80%
This bench: 98.7%
Great: 97%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3080-$625
CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 10GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing below potential (77th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
194% Outstanding
Lighting 283
Reflection 252
Parallax 306
230% 280 fps
MRender 318
Gravity 237
Splatting 179
193% 245 fps
Poor: 163%
This bench: 194%
Great: 202%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sabrent Rocket 4 NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$160
312GB free
Firmware: RKT401.1 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2593 3754 3792 3787 2267 957 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
379% Outstanding
Read 2,190
Write 3,457
Mixed 2,141
SusWrite 2,858
604% 2,662 MB/s
4K Read 46.5
4K Write 154
4K Mixed 77.6
252% 92.8 MB/s
DQ Read 1037
DQ Write 677
DQ Mixed 848
635% 854 MB/s
Poor: 207%
This bench: 379%
Great: 500%
Sabrent Rocket 4 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$100
332GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RKT401.1 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 974 3632 2777 965 965 954 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
307% Outstanding
Read 2,155
Write 3487
Mixed 2236
SusWrite 1,711
543% 2,397 MB/s
4K Read 49.2
4K Write 154
4K Mixed 78.5
257% 93.9 MB/s
DQ Read 969
DQ Write 634
DQ Mixed 803
598% 802 MB/s
Poor: 189%
This bench: 307%
Great: 486%
Sabrent Rocket 4 NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$160
360GB free
Firmware: RKT401.3 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 505 479 536 487 519 542 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
227% Outstanding
Read 2,216
Write 2,100
Mixed 2,118
SusWrite 511
389% 1,737 MB/s
4K Read 45.7
4K Write 130
4K Mixed 71.6
230% 82.4 MB/s
DQ Read 1,037
DQ Write 548
DQ Mixed 394
399% 660 MB/s
Poor: 207%
This bench: 227%
Great: 500%
Samsung 870 QVO 2TB-$145
1TB free
Firmware: SVQ01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 444 450 449 448 444 444 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
106% Outstanding
Read 488
Write 445
Mixed 416
SusWrite 446
101% 449 MB/s
4K Read 36.8
4K Write 82.4
4K Mixed 47.7
160% 55.6 MB/s
DQ Read 220
DQ Write 185
DQ Mixed 101
103% 169 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 106%
Great: 128%
WD Red 6TB (2019)-$129
5TB free
Firmware: 82.00A82
SusWrite @10s intervals: 28 28 28 28 28 28 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 20% Great: 97%
WD Red 6TB (2019)-$129
5TB free
Firmware: 82.00A82
SusWrite @10s intervals: 28 27 28 28 28 28 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 20% Great: 97%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3600 C16 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
124% Outstanding
MC Read 50.7
MC Write 44.8
MC Mixed 43.8
133% 46.4 GB/s
SC Read 27.9
SC Write 26.9
SC Mixed 41.5
92% 32.1 GB/s
Latency 69.3
58% 69.3 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 124%
Great: 136%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-X570 AORUS MASTER Builds (Compare 5,025 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 184%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 201%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte X570 AORUS MASTER - $550

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 86% - Excellent Total price: $1,531
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback