Gigabyte GA-A320M-DS2-CF

Performance Results


Gaming 24% Surfboard	Desktop 73% Battleship	Workstation 19% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	29.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	44.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

3 years ago, 2 years ago.

System	Gigabyte A320M-DS2
Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-A320M-DS2-CF (all builds)
Memory	4.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20171205
Uptime	4 Days
Run Date	Nov 26 '20 at 22:04
Run Duration	145 Seconds
Run User	SVK-User
Background CPU	7%

Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 3 1200-$100 83,528 User benchmarks, average bench 57% AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	67% Good	Memory 68.6 1-Core 101 2-Core 190 67% 120 Pts	4-Core 379 8-Core 371 50% 375 Pts	64-Core 369 23% 369 Pts
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 67% Great: 68%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% MSI(1462 8C96) CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 432.00 Performing below potential (76^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	29.8% Poor	Lighting 37.6 Reflection 42.1 Parallax 38.8 31% 39.5 fps	MRender 38.2 Gravity 39.6 Splatting 28.1 28% 35.3 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 29.8% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WD Green 120GB (2018)-$59 69,933 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 30GB free (System drive) Firmware: UE300000 SusWrite @10s intervals: 54 18 13 35 33 20 MB/s Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)	44.8% Average	Read 408 Write 84.5 Mixed 140 SusWrite 28.7 36% 165 MB/s	4K Read 22 4K Write 32.8 4K Mixed 18.5 74% 24.4 MB/s	DQ Read 115 DQ Write 69.2 DQ Mixed 38.9 43% 74.4 MB/s
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 44.8% Great: 53%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$39 1,120,098 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 115GB free Firmware: CC43 SusWrite @10s intervals: 131 135 133 135 136 136 MB/s Performing way below expectations (20^th percentile)	78.1% Very good	Read 138 Write 72.6 Mixed 75.4 SusWrite 134 77% 105 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.7 137% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 78.1% Great: 113%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 500GB 4,068 User benchmarks, average bench 26% 1GB free, PID a006 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 32.6 Write 29.9 Mixed 22.2 35% 28.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.6 70% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 11% Great: 43%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown TEAMGROUP-UD4-2400 1x8GB 13,006 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 1 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	47.1% Average	MC Read 17 MC Write 16.8 MC Mixed 14.7 46% 16.2 GB/s	SC Read 16.6 SC Write 16.7 SC Mixed 16 47% 16.4 GB/s	Latency 105 38% 105 ns
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 47.1% Great: 47%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-A320M-DS2-CF Builds (Compare 194 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 23%

Surfboard

Desktop 69%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 20%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-A320M-DS2-CF

CPU
Ryzen 3 1200AMD $100Bench 57%, 83,528 samples	33x
Ryzen 5 1600AMD $110Bench 70%, 392,253 samples	25x
Ryzen 5 1500XAMD $131Bench 66%, 70,038 samples	17x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	39x
GTX 1050Nvidia $101Bench 26%, 269,381 samples	13x
Radeon R7 GraphicsAMDBench 6%, 37,078 samples	12x

SSD
A400 120GBKingston $29Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	8x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	7x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	7x

RAM
HyperX 2400 C15 2x8GBKingstonBench 76%, 122,822 samples	8x
Aegis DDR4 2133 C15 1x8GBG.SKILLBench 37%, 8,300 samples	7x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	4x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 79% - Very good

Total price: $188

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16