Verypc BL52-N

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics0.68% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive51.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemVerypc BL52-N  (all builds)
MotherboardIntel DH61DL
Memory2.6 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20120531
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 26 '20 at 21:38
Run Duration121 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-2100-$49
LGA1155 CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
62.3% Good
Memory 89.8
1-Core 80.5
2-Core 139
64% 103 Pts
4-Core 204
8-Core 204
27% 204 Pts
64-Core 204
13% 204 Pts
Poor: 35%
This bench: 62.3%
Great: 61%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia NVS 300
HP(103C 0863) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 340.52
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
0.68% Terrible
Lighting 1
Reflection 1.8
Parallax 0.3
1% 1.03 fps
MRender 0.8
Gravity 0.4
Splatting 0.4
0% 0.53 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 0.68%
Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Msata 128GB 128GB
99GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2011XKR
SusWrite @10s intervals: 213 214 197 213 215 211 MB/s
Performing below potential (35th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
51.6% Above average
Read 235
Write 213
Mixed 206
SusWrite 211
49% 216 MB/s
4K Read 24.2
4K Write 49.8
4K Mixed 20.1
89% 31.4 MB/s
DQ Read 27.4
DQ Write 91.7
DQ Mixed 23.5
28% 47.5 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 51.6%
Great: 79%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT351U6CFR8C-H9 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
29% Poor
MC Read 9.5
MC Write 9.2
MC Mixed 8.7
26% 9.13 GB/s
SC Read 8.3
SC Write 9.1
SC Mixed 7.9
24% 8.43 GB/s
Latency 67.5
59% 67.5 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 29%
Great: 30%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback