Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 49.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Boot Drive	60.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

3 years ago, 3 years ago.

PC Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-3667U 3,556 User benchmarks, average bench 51% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)	49.6% Average	Memory 69.4 1-Core 71 2-Core 121 53% 87 Pts	4-Core 173 8-Core 180 24% 177 Pts	64-Core 198 12% 198 Pts
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 49.6% Great: 59%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Liteonit LMT-256M6M mSATA 256GB 4,013 User benchmarks, average bench 73% 53GB free (System drive) Firmware: VZDB SusWrite @10s intervals: 361 333 338 360 308 166 MB/s Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	60.2% Good	Read 428 Write 357 Mixed 275 SusWrite 311 77% 343 MB/s	4K Read 14.1 4K Write 27.2 4K Mixed 15.2 55% 18.8 MB/s	DQ Read 208 DQ Write 114 DQ Mixed 119 100% 147 MB/s
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 60.2% Great: 88%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471B1G73CB0-CK0 2x8GB 423 User benchmarks, average bench 52% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing as expected (46^th percentile)	53.5% Above average	MC Read 20.2 MC Write 19.9 MC Mixed 17.5 55% 19.2 GB/s	SC Read 14.3 SC Write 15.2 SC Mixed 16.5 44% 15.3 GB/s	Latency 103 39% 103 ns
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 53.5% Great: 57%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 53%

Yacht

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 409,110 samples	73x

SSD
PM830 mSATA 256GBSamsungBench 63%, 9,379 samples	18x
LMT-256M6M mSATA 256GBLiteonitBench 73%, 4,013 samples	12x
PM830 mSATA 128GBSamsungBench 54%, 663 samples	7x

RAM
NT4GC64B8HG0NS-DI 2x4GBNanyaBench 51%, 5,366 samples	6x
HMT351S6EFR8A-PB 2x4GBHynixBench 50%, 13,765 samples	4x
HMT351S6EFR8A-PB 1x4GBHynixBench 28%, 12,200 samples	3x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16