Hp-pavilion AU993AA-ABL p6218f

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 12% Tree trunk	Desktop 52% Yacht	Workstation 9% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 44.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	28.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (50%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Hp-pavilion AU993AA-ABL p6218f (all builds)
Motherboard	FOXCONN ALOE
Memory	9.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20090911
Uptime	1.8 Days
Run Date	Nov 26 '20 at 19:07
Run Duration	192 Seconds
Run User	CAN-User
Background CPU	50%

Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Athlon II X3 425 1,367 User benchmarks, average bench 42% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 3 threads Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)	44.4% Average	Memory 69.9 1-Core 39.5 2-Core 77.8 41% 62.4 Pts	4-Core 113 8-Core 114 15% 114 Pts	64-Core 117 7% 117 Pts
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 44.4% Great: 50%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% Asus(1043 862A) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 432.00 Performing below potential (35^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	28.4% Poor	Lighting 35.7 Reflection 39.5 Parallax 37.4 29% 37.5 fps	MRender 37.3 Gravity 38.1 Splatting 26.7 27% 34 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 28.4% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Hitachi HDT722516DLA380 165GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 31% 137GB free Firmware: V43OA96A SusWrite @10s intervals: 59 57 57 52 54 54 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	34% Below average	Read 62.6 Write 57.7 Mixed 40 SusWrite 55.5 40% 54 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.8 149% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 34% Great: 34%
WD Green 1TB (2009)-$65 103,919 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 254GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 52 50 50 51 52 50 MB/s Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	29.9% Poor	Read 52.8 Write 53 Mixed 51.3 SusWrite 51 39% 52 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.8 144% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 29.9% Great: 57%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28 1,562,409 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 467GB free (System drive) Firmware: CC4D SusWrite @10s intervals: 112 88 129 166 165 166 MB/s Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)	86.3% Excellent	Read 163 Write 158 Mixed 72.4 SusWrite 138 97% 133 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 1 174% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 86.3% Great: 112%
Generic- SD/MMC 1GB 75 User benchmarks, average bench 4% 1GB free, PID 6362 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.8 3.7 3.9 3.9 3.9 3.9 MB/s Performing as expected (44^th percentile)	3.45% Terrible	Read 13.2 Write 3.2 Mixed 4.5 SusWrite 3.8 7% 6.17 MB/s	4K Read 3 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 11% 1 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.45% Great: 5%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 2TB 819 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 1.5TB free, PID d011 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 22 21 23 23 23 23 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	13.1% Very poor	Read 23.4 Write 23.5 Mixed 21.6 SusWrite 22.6 31% 22.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.4 67% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 13.1% Great: 60%
Seagate FreeAgent 1TB 1,597 User benchmarks, average bench 16% 718GB free, PID 3001 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 19 21 21 21 21 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	11.5% Very poor	Read 24.1 Write 23.8 Mixed 19.2 SusWrite 20.3 30% 21.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 0.8 67% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 11.5% Great: 20%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown PSD34G160081 PSD34G160081 PSD34G160081 PSD34G160081 16GB 35 User benchmarks, average bench 35% 1066, 1066, 1066, 1066 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB Performing below potential (19^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	26.4% Poor	MC Read 11.2 MC Write 7 MC Mixed 8.9 26% 9.03 GB/s	SC Read 6.2 SC Write 6.6 SC Mixed 7 19% 6.6 GB/s	Latency 102 39% 102 ns
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 26.4% Great: 56%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical AU993AA-ABL p6218f Builds (Compare 2 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 0%

Incomplete

Desktop 0%

Incomplete

Workstation 0%

Incomplete

System: Hp-pavilion AU993AA-ABL p6218f

CPU
Athlon II X3 425AMDBench 42%, 1,367 samples	2x

GPU
Quadro K2000NvidiaBench 7%, 13,526 samples	1x
Radeon HD 4670ATIBench 4%, 21,442 samples	1x

RAM
EBJ21UE8BDF0-DJ-F 4x2GBElpidaBench 40%, 1,380 samples	1x
M378B5173BH0-CK0 Micron 16JTF51264AZ-1G6M1 Kingston 9905584-003.A00LF Micron 8JTF25664AZ-1G6M1 14GBSamsungBench 22%, 1 sample	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Hp-pavilion AU993AA-ABL p6218f

Performance Results

PC Performing below expectations (28th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

System: Hp-pavilion AU993AA-ABL p6218f

Feedback

PC Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)