Asus Crosshair V Formula

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 42% Speed boat	Desktop 77% Battleship	Workstation 35% Jet ski


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	54% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Windows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.

Run History

1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago.

Motherboard	Asus Crosshair V Formula (all builds)
Memory	3.9 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20121017
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Nov 26 '20 at 19:00
Run Duration	164 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	0%

Watch Gameplay: 590 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (59^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-8370-$190 28,563 User benchmarks, average bench 66% Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 4.9 GHz, turbo 4.9 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	79.9% Very good	Memory 93.7 1-Core 91.7 2-Core 183 74% 123 Pts	4-Core 357 8-Core 595 60% 476 Pts	64-Core 596 40% 596 Pts
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 79.9% Great: 73%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 590-$200 82,756 User benchmarks, average bench 60% PowerColor(148C 2391) CLim: 1625 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 20.10.1 Performing below potential (11^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	54% Above average	Lighting 65.3 Reflection 69.8 Parallax 111 53% 82.1 fps	MRender 68.2 Gravity 68.9 Splatting 54.2 55% 63.8 fps
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 54% Great: 68%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
CT1000BX500SSD1 1TB 10,421 User benchmarks, average bench 74% 463GB free (System drive) Firmware: M6CR030 SusWrite @10s intervals: 350 328 1.9 40 94 91 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 44% Great: 101%
Samsung 850 Pro 256GB-$200 94,819 User benchmarks, average bench 102% 128GB free Firmware: EXM04B6Q Relative performance n/a - sequential bench incomplete		Read 3,904 Write 2635 Mixed 2991 705% 3,177 MB/s	4K Read 221 4K Write 137 4K Mixed 151 602% 170 MB/s	DQ Read 544 DQ Write 390 DQ Mixed 477 354% 471 MB/s
Poor: 73% Great: 124%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$52 285,231 User benchmarks, average bench 91% 80GB free Firmware: 0001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 104 98 96 102 106 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	57.1% Above average	Read 98.7 Write 118 Mixed 73.5 SusWrite 100 72% 97.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 0.6 4K Mixed 0.1 56% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 57.1% Great: 110%
WD Blue 500GB (2008)-$38 157,116 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 491GB free Firmware: 05.01D05 SusWrite @10s intervals: 153 131 144 106 108 106 MB/s Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	68.2% Good	Read 113 Write 96.2 Mixed 32.8 SusWrite 125 66% 91.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 2.3 4K Mixed 0.6 134% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 68.2% Great: 71%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 12GB 68,195 User benchmarks, average bench 35% 1866, 1866, 1866 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096 MB Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	43% Average	MC Read 16.3 MC Write 13.8 MC Mixed 13.5 42% 14.5 GB/s	SC Read 11.4 SC Write 8.8 SC Mixed 13 32% 11.1 GB/s	Latency 60.4 66% 60.4 ns
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 43% Great: 49%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money.

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Crosshair V Formula Builds (Compare 1,004 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.

Gaming 38%

Jet ski

Desktop 72%

Battleship

Workstation 32%

Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus Crosshair V Formula - $220

CPU
FX-8350AMD $130Bench 66%, 275,971 samples	270x
FX-8150AMD $183Bench 62%, 16,220 samples	228x
FX-8120AMDBench 59%, 22,389 samples	107x

GPU
RX 580AMD $218Bench 55%, 623,105 samples	98x
GTX 970Nvidia $340Bench 50%, 648,344 samples	58x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $290Bench 57%, 1,110,464 samples	50x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $57Bench 108%, 504,559 samples	43x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 67%, 266,434 samples	31x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $70Bench 105%, 768,156 samples	22x

RAM
16GBUnknownBench 40%, 47,536 samples	583x
8GBUnknownBench 34%, 100,449 samples	169x
32GBUnknownBench 48%, 3,509 samples	98x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 63% - Good

Total price: $624

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-10600K $257	Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400	Crucial MX500 250GB $47
Intel Core i5-9600K $200	Nvidia RTX 3070 $500	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i5-10400F $161	Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $40

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $43	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $79	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $38	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $71	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16