Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X532FA_S532FA

Performance Results


Gaming 12% Tree trunk	Desktop 77% Battleship	Workstation 11% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	4.75% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	158% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

CPU throttled at 90% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago.

System	Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X532FA_S532FA (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK X532FA
Memory	9.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190617
Uptime	0.9 Days
Run Date	Nov 26 '20 at 18:06
Run Duration	131 Seconds
Run User	FRA-User
Background CPU	2%
CPU Throttled	90%

PC Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-8565U 81,207 User benchmarks, average bench 55% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	79.8% Very good	Memory 82.9 1-Core 138 2-Core 223 84% 148 Pts	4-Core 413 8-Core 615 64% 514 Pts	64-Core 621 38% 621 Pts
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 79.8% Great: 72%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 620 178,291 User benchmarks, average bench 5% Asus(1043 1991) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8935 Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)	4.75% Terrible	Lighting 4.9 Reflection 6.8 Parallax 6.6 4% 6.1 fps	MRender 8.5 Gravity 5.5 Splatting 8.5 6% 7.5 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 4.75% Great: 6%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G-1002 512GB 4,269 User benchmarks, average bench 141% 266GB free (System drive) Firmware: 20110000 SusWrite @10s intervals: 711 720 714 723 757 647 MB/s Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)	158% Outstanding	Read 728 Write 742 Mixed 555 SusWrite 712 154% 684 MB/s	4K Read 40.8 4K Write 97.5 4K Mixed 56 185% 64.8 MB/s	DQ Read 856 DQ Write 400 DQ Mixed 727 513% 661 MB/s
Poor: 89% ↑ This bench: 158% Great: 197%
Samsung Portable SSD T5 1TB 13,039 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 747GB free Firmware: 0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 435 440 447 446 455 431 MB/s Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)	78.1% Very good	Read 362 Write 360 Mixed 334 SusWrite 442 85% 375 MB/s	4K Read 21.5 4K Write 40.8 4K Mixed 27.3 89% 29.9 MB/s	DQ Read 207 DQ Write 187 DQ Mixed 195 147% 196 MB/s
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 78.1% Great: 99%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 4ATS1G64HZ-2G6E1 16GB 7 User benchmarks, average bench 72% 2667, 2400 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	69.4% Good	MC Read 26.5 MC Write 26.3 MC Mixed 20.1 69% 24.3 GB/s	SC Read 17.1 SC Write 27.4 SC Mixed 22.5 64% 22.3 GB/s	Latency 75.3 53% 75.3 ns
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 69.4% Great: 80%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X532FA_S532FA Builds (Compare 57 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 9%

Tree trunk

Desktop 55%

Gunboat

Workstation 8%

Tree trunk

System: Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X532FA_S532FA

CPU
Core i5-8265UIntelBench 53%, 87,841 samples	31x
Core i7-8565UIntelBench 55%, 81,207 samples	26x

GPU
UHD Graphics 620IntelBench 5%, 178,291 samples	57x

SSD
PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G-1002 512GBWDCBench 141%, 4,269 samples	33x
660p NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBIntel $60Bench 156%, 162,275 samples	11x
RBUSNS8154P3256GJ3 256GBKingstonBench 97%, 7,536 samples	4x

RAM
4ATF51264HZ-2G3E1 Samsung M471A5244CB0-CTD 8GBMicronBench 56%, 1,078 samples	25x
4ATF51264HZ-2G3E1 Samsung M471A1K43DB1-CTD 12GBMicronBench 54%, 204 samples	6x
4ATS1G64HZ-2G6E1 Samsung M471A1K43DB1-CTD 16GBMicronBench 71%, 550 samples	5x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16