Acer Aspire xxxx

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (78th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 22 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 44.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics3.93% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemAcer Aspire xxxx  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Aspire xxxx
Memory1.8 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100825
Uptime15 Days
Run DateNov 26 '20 at 17:11
Run Duration134 Seconds
Run User AUT-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing above expectations (78th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5 M 430
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.25 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
44.8% Average
Memory 64.6
1-Core 62.8
2-Core 108
48% 78.5 Pts
4-Core 147
8-Core 144
20% 146 Pts
64-Core 144
9% 144 Pts
Poor: 28%
This bench: 44.8%
Great: 45%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6500M
Acer(1025 037E) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
3.93% Terrible
Lighting 4.9
Reflection 6
Parallax 4.2
4% 5.03 fps
MRender 5.3
Gravity 3.7
Splatting 4.9
4% 4.63 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.93%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intenso SATA III SSD 480GB
264GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFM61.3
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
Read 163
Write 97.8
Mixed 82.3
25% 114 MB/s
4K Read 11.6
4K Write 14.2
4K Mixed 9.1
37% 11.6 MB/s
DQ Read 16.6
DQ Write 17.8
DQ Mixed 15.7
12% 16.7 MB/s
Poor: 40% Great: 102%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Nanya NT2GC64B8HC0NS-CG 2x2GB
2 of 4 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR3 1334 MHz
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
24.1% Poor
MC Read 7.8
MC Write 6.8
MC Mixed 10.2
24% 8.27 GB/s
SC Read 6.8
SC Write 5
SC Mixed 6
17% 5.93 GB/s
Latency 115
35% 115 ns
Poor: 16%
This bench: 24.1%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire xxxx Builds (Compare 74 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 42%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire xxxx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 42% - Average Total price: $199
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback