Lenovo 90FB0001US

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics56.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemLenovo 90FB0001US  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 3642
Memory8.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160905
Uptime3.6 Days
Run DateNov 26 '20 at 16:54
Run Duration149 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 16%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6400-$79
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
70.6% Very good
Memory 80
1-Core 91.1
2-Core 182
68% 118 Pts
4-Core 353
8-Core 360
48% 357 Pts
64-Core 362
22% 362 Pts
Poor: 39%
This bench: 70.6%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 2012 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 457.09
Performing below potential (59th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
56.3% Above average
Lighting 68.8
Reflection 76.8
Parallax 68.2
56% 71.3 fps
MRender 66.1
Gravity 70.4
Splatting 70.3
57% 68.9 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 56.3%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 EVO 250GB
315GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 366 402 408 430 436 434 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - drive id incomplete or inconclusive
Read 481
Write 438
Mixed 356
SusWrite 413
95% 422 MB/s
4K Read 29.3
4K Write 85.2
4K Mixed 40
141% 51.5 MB/s
DQ Read 352
DQ Write 303
DQ Mixed 273
219% 309 MB/s
Poor: 64% Great: 122%
Samsung Flash Drive 257GB
77GB free, PID 1000
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 25 22 22 20 21 21 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
35% Below average
Read 38.2
Write 15.7
Mixed 31.8
SusWrite 21.9
34% 26.9 MB/s
4K Read 7
4K Write 7.5
4K Mixed 5.3
461% 6.6 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 35%
Great: 129%
SanDisk Cruzer Glide 32GB
24GB free, PID 5575
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.3 7.9 8.1 8.2 8.4 8.4 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
5.81% Terrible
Read 20.7
Write 8
Mixed 10.2
SusWrite 7.7
14% 11.7 MB/s
4K Read 3.5
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 2
84% 1.87 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 5.81%
Great: 19%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905678-023.A00G Hynix HMA451U6AFR8N-TF Hynix HMA451U6AFR8N-TF 16GB
2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
48.1% Average
MC Read 17.5
MC Write 17.2
MC Mixed 15.6
48% 16.8 GB/s
SC Read 11.7
SC Write 15.6
SC Mixed 14.1
39% 13.8 GB/s
Latency 80.5
50% 80.5 ns
Poor: 42%
This bench: 48.1%
Great: 48%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 90FB0001US Builds (Compare 137 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 90FB0001US

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 56% - Above average Total price: $159
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback