MSI Z170A TOMAHAWK AC (MS-7970)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 53%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 46%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics59.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive126% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemMSI MS-7970
MotherboardMSI Z170A TOMAHAWK AC (MS-7970)  (all builds)
Memory58.6 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20171206
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 26 '20 at 12:50
Run Duration170 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700-$180
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
81.4% Excellent
Memory 82.8
1-Core 123
2-Core 237
82% 148 Pts
4-Core 431
8-Core 653
67% 542 Pts
64-Core 647
40% 647 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 81.4%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1060 6GB
Nvidia(10DE 12D9) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1936 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 452.06
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
59.4% Above average
Lighting 72.2
Reflection 75.6
Parallax 69.1
59% 72.3 fps
MRender 85.1
Gravity 71.5
Splatting 68.1
60% 74.9 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 59.4%
Great: 62%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba OCZ RD400 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$70
326GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 57CZ4102 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 564 487 776 678 610 670 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
126% Outstanding
Read 822
Write 742
Mixed 735
SusWrite 631
165% 732 MB/s
4K Read 19.5
4K Write 117
4K Mixed 45.4
150% 60.5 MB/s
DQ Read 182
DQ Write 148
DQ Mixed 139
111% 156 MB/s
Poor: 116%
This bench: 126%
Great: 242%
Samsung 750 EVO 120GB-$35
107GB free
Firmware: MAT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 263 126 126 127 128 126 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Read 487
Write 434
Mixed 305
SusWrite 149
77% 344 MB/s
4K Read 43.5
4K Write 112
4K Mixed 53.9
194% 69.9 MB/s
DQ Read 359
DQ Write 307
DQ Mixed 299
233% 322 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 103%
Great: 110%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$70
2TB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 105 119 116 118 119 115 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
65.9% Good
Read 114
Write 108
Mixed 73
SusWrite 116
75% 103 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
145% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 65.9%
Great: 67%
ST2000VN 004-2E4164 2TB
1.5TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 119 118 117 117 118 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
43% Average
Read 87.3
Write 167
Mixed 72.2
SusWrite 115
157% 110 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.1
62% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 43%
Great: 51%
WDC WD20 EARS-00MVWB0 2TB
1.5TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 119 118 117 117 118 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 55.2
Write 95.1
Mixed 69.5
SusWrite 115
122% 83.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.6
84% 1 MB/s
Poor: 8% Great: 48%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BLS16G4D240FSC.16FAD 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (25th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
76.7% Very good
MC Read 26.5
MC Write 29.8
MC Mixed 24.9
77% 27.1 GB/s
SC Read 16.6
SC Write 33.7
SC Mixed 23.8
71% 24.7 GB/s
Latency 75.4
53% 75.4 ns
Poor: 72%
This bench: 76.7%
Great: 87%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z170A TOMAHAWK AC (MS-7970) Builds (Compare 359 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 69%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 59%
Gunboat

Motherboard: MSI Z170A TOMAHAWK AC (MS-7970)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 97% - Outstanding Total price: $461
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback