Asus ROG Zephyrus M15 GU502LW_GU502LW

Performance Results


Gaming 95% Nuclear submarine	Desktop 82% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 89% Aircraft carrier


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	133% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	229% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (23%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago.

System	Asus ROG Zephyrus M15 GU502LW_GU502LW (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK GU502LW
Memory	9.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20200901
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Nov 26 '20 at 06:45
Run Duration	129 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	23%

Watch Gameplay: 3070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-10750H 206,796 User benchmarks, average bench 77% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)	70.7% Very good	Memory 77.7 1-Core 111 2-Core 211 75% 133 Pts	4-Core 342 8-Core 648 59% 495 Pts	64-Core 863 53% 863 Pts
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 70.7% Great: 89%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3070-$400 619,642 User benchmarks, average bench 148% Gigabyte(1458 405C) ≥ 4GB Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 27.21.14.5730 Performing below potential (5^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	133% Outstanding	Lighting 195 Reflection 153 Parallax 165 159% 171 fps	MRender 152 Gravity 129 Splatting 117 107% 132 fps
Poor: 135% ↑ This bench: 133% Great: 158%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Intel 660p NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$74 163,917 User benchmarks, average bench 191% 755GB free (System drive) Firmware: 002C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1223 1292 1350 1385 1391 1390 MB/s Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	229% Outstanding	Read 1,373 Write 1,431 Mixed 1,016 SusWrite 1,338 291% 1,290 MB/s	4K Read 43.4 4K Write 114 4K Mixed 62.4 206% 73.4 MB/s	DQ Read 557 DQ Write 700 DQ Mixed 253 295% 503 MB/s
Poor: 127% ↑ This bench: 229% Great: 255%
Kingston DataTraveler 101 G2 USB 2.0 8GB-$6 2,874 User benchmarks, average bench 5% 7GB free, PID 1642 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.7 1.8 2.4 2.2 4.2 4.2 MB/s Performing as expected (40^th percentile)	4.46% Terrible	Read 16.2 Write 8 Mixed 9.2 SusWrite 3.1 11% 9.12 MB/s	4K Read 4.8 4K Write 0.1 4K Mixed 0.2 28% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 4.46% Great: 7%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 8ATF1G64HZ-3G2J1 Samsung M471A1K43DB1-CWE 16GB 8,060 User benchmarks, average bench 90% 3200, 3200 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	60.7% Good	MC Read 26.1 MC Write 19.3 MC Mixed 15.5 58% 20.3 GB/s	SC Read 14.9 SC Write 31.8 SC Mixed 25.3 69% 24 GB/s	Latency 85 47% 85 ns
Poor: 66% ↑ This bench: 60.7% Great: 106%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical ROG Zephyrus M15 GU502LW_GU502LW Builds (Compare 1,195 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 67%

Battle cruiser

Desktop 86%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 59%

Gunboat

System: Asus ROG Zephyrus M15 GU502LW_GU502LW

CPU
Core i7-10750HIntelBench 77%, 206,796 samples	1,117x
Core i7-10875HIntelBench 79%, 35,361 samples	78x

GPU
GeForce RTX 2070 with Max-Q DesignNvidiaBench 79%, 8,783 samples	641x
UHD GraphicsIntelBench 5%, 187,969 samples	545x
RTX 3070Nvidia $400Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	6x

SSD
PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-1T00-1002 1TBWDCBench 224%, 12,046 samples	387x
660p NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBIntel $74Bench 191%, 163,917 samples	318x
WDC PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-1T00-1002 1TBNvmeBench 182%, 1,280 samples	136x

RAM
M471A1K43CB1-CWE M471A1K43DB1-CWE 16GBSamsungBench 90%, 3,469 samples	443x
8ATF1G64HZ-3G2J1 Samsung M471A1K43DB1-CWE 16GBMicronBench 90%, 8,060 samples	439x
8ATF1G64HZ-3G2J1 2x8GBMicronBench 85%, 42,443 samples	60x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16